this post was submitted on 14 May 2025
185 points (99.5% liked)

politics

23538 readers
2232 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 32 points 3 days ago (1 children)

This is a very good step in the right direction because right now, across the country, law enforcement routinely purchases information on individuals it would otherwise need a warrant to obtain.

What does that mean? In every state other than Montana, if police want to know where you have been, rather than presenting evidence and sending a warrant signed by a judge to a company like Verizon or Google to get your geolocation data for a particular set of time, they only need to buy that same data from data brokers. In other words, all the location data apps on your phone collect —sometimes recording your exact location every few minutes—is just sitting for sale on the open market. And police routinely take that as an opportunity to skirt your Fourth Amendment rights.

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 4 points 3 days ago

To be fair, Montana has a year over year increase in child abuse claims. So they probably don’t want more evidence.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (1 children)

The bigger problem is that this data broker business is actually still legal.

By all means, such businesses need to be made illegal, shut down, and the data wiped.

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And the C-levels' homes bulldozed and their fields salted.

[–] Treczoks@lemmy.world 2 points 3 days ago

While the bulldozer driver conveniently forgot to inform the inhabitants?

[–] frezik@midwest.social 20 points 3 days ago (2 children)

More data showing that Montana might look deep red, but will make a surprise progressive move from time to time.

[–] foggy@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Western mintana's vibe has always felt very "If ya ain't fuckin with my shit or anyone else's shit then rock on."

[–] blakenong@lemmings.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Well no……. They don’t care if you’re fucking with anyone else’s shit. Just their own.

Montana has several anti-trans laws and prohibits drag performers from reading books to kids.

Montana is red as fuck. They just don’t want anyone looking into them because they would probably go to jail.

In fact, Montana has a growing issue of child abuse, year over year.

Sick fucks.

https://www.cwla.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/04/Montana-Fact-Sheet-2022.pdf

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 1 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

It has the same problem eastern Washington has, proximity to Idaho, which is a special flavor of inbred Nazi, plus the downside of bordering other fairly… weird states, like Wyoming. I drove from western Washington to Illinois two years back, with hot pink hair, and I had to cover my hair in Montana because I genuinely felt unsafe, I’m not trans, just a cis woman with pink hair and even that got me all sorts of nasty stares and comments. There’s a strong live and let live culture too, but you’re right, it’s being actively strangled out at this point.

I drove through the same area again just last week, but only to Boulder and back, with my natural brown hair and had a significantly more friendly visit… jokes on them I’m SO much more left now that I was two years ago despite the signs

[–] futatorius@lemm.ee 4 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

the same problem eastern Washington has

Another problem is that it's a colony of Utah. On the wrong side of the Cascades, the Saints have way too much influence.

even that got me all sorts of nasty stares and comments

I have the opposite problem. I'm a fairly large, muscular old man with a shaved head and a broken nose. They always assume I'm one of them, and overshare their racist MAGA bullshit.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

Montana went to Bernie at least once