this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
665 points (99.3% liked)

politics

23545 readers
2630 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A few snippets from the article:

“They gave her some medication, but they didn’t do any tests, didn’t do any CT scans. If they did, they would have caught it,” Newkirk said.

Who said that an ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure? How much would the CT scan have cost?

Smith ended up being taken to the hospital where she worked. A CT scan revealed multiple blood clots in her brain. Unfortunately, there was nothing doctors could do, and Smith was declared brain dead.

A mother and wife lost because the hospital wanted to skimp out on the diagnostic that might have saved her.

More than 90 days later, Smith’s family, including her young son, is still by her side as she remains on life support, but they say they weren’t given any say in her case because of Georgia’s heartbeat law. The law bans abortions after a fetal heartbeat is detected, typically around 6 weeks into pregnancy.

90 days out of a possible 220 or so days. How much has it cost to keep her alive since her brain death, and how much is it going to cost to keep her alive for 130 more days? And remember, it's not just $, but emotional health for her boyfriend, mother, son, and anyone else not mentioned/interviewed.

“She’s pregnant with my grandson, but my grandson may be blind, may not be able to walk, wheelchair bound. We don’t know if he’ll live once she has him,” Newkirk said. “It should have been left up to the family.”

And all of this for a baby that is likely to suffer major medical issues due to gestating in a brain-dead, possibly otherwise compromised body, hooped up on medication and other medical intervention to preserve the body's life long enough for the baby to be born, possibly severely compromised itself.

Newkirk says she wants people to understand the human toll of Georgia’s law and the emotional weight of being stripped of medical decision-making during a crisis.

But of course Cons don't give a shit about this. Woman dies, leaving behind a son, mother, boyfriend, and countless friends? Nah, that's not important. BABY MUST BE BORN, no matter how injured gestating in a body like that will make it, making the baby a burden on other people, because GAWD'S WILL and bullshit like that. :|

(page 2) 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Cruxifux@feddit.nl 13 points 4 days ago

They are robbing these people. This is a massive injustice. What the fuck.

[–] HubertManne@piefed.social 9 points 4 days ago

I can't imagine living with this origin story.

[–] Laereht@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Right wing monsters want to kill women. This is all going according to their plan.

This is what the "pro-life" agenda looks like.

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

Georgiastan

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Surley the for profit system will kill her if they're too broke to afford the hospital bills though, right?

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

And expose themselves to a charge of murder of the foetus?

[–] jagged_circle@feddit.nl 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

I think that only applies to poor people

[–] psud@aussie.zone 2 points 3 days ago

Several hospitals have let people die because the alternative was killing a foetus which would be murder in those states

[–] thejoker954@lemmy.world 4 points 4 days ago

So i guess the hippocratic oath doesn't mean anything to these doctors either.

[–] Zealousideal_Fox_900@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Every healthcare regulation is written in blood, grief, sorrow and sadness.

[–] psud@aussie.zone 1 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Sure, but we don't usually fix the problem, then go back to the blood, grief, sorrow, and sadness

Yeah, that's why in most places, they don't erase those rules again. Except in NSW and the US where it is a straight up competition to break those rules again the most times.

[–] P1k1e@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

I like that you call them Cons

[–] Mallspice@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago

I’d say this is like Death Stranding but at least in DS the US had to smuggle brain dead women from Mexico.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›