this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
1044 points (97.8% liked)

ADHD memes

10179 readers
1280 users here now

ADHD Memes

The lighter side of ADHD


Rules

  1. No Party Pooping

Other ND communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] socsa@piefed.social 12 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This extends to being an expert in your field as well. We've done an experiment and the result is both incredible and obvious. To me.

The struggle is then to connect and explain these things I am seeing to other people who are themselves also extremely intelligent but don't have the same exact brand of autism.

same exact ~~brand of autism~~.

information set. You are describing knowledge, not process.

[–] Apeman42@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

My wife and I call this "Goldbluming", after Jeff Goldblum in the "Canceled" South Park episode.

Wait a minute: chaos theory! Chaos theory, it was first thought of in the '60s. Sixty. That's the number of episodes they made of Punky Brewster before it was cancelled. Cancelled... Don't you see? The show is over! The aliens are cancelling Earth!

[–] ieatpwns@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

Neurotypicals don’t have “trains of thought” they have “teleporters of thought”

[–] Professorozone@lemmy.world 10 points 1 week ago

Funny thing is, sometimes I'll do this out of the blue days later and my wife picks up on it immediately.

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

If the other person can't follow your train of thought, it can feel as though the emotional and cognitive connection/trust that was built in the conversation was abandoned along with the previous context. This can happen when there is a non-trivial jump in context between ideas.

Steering the conversation can be done by introducing intermediary steps that are connected to the previous topic in a self-evident way. This maintains that cognitive and emotional connection/trust because you are showing that you value the other person's understanding and participation.

Figuring out what "non-trivial" or "self-evident" means is probably the hard part but you'd probably want to consider each step in, for example:

Grass, meadow, forest, tree, timber, log truck, mill, paper, exports, shipping dock, ocean, ice caps, ice bergs, titantic, James Cameron, Michael bay, transformers.

You could probably go from each one to the next trivially, steering the conversation from grass to meadow and so on through the list. But to go from grass to transformers without intermediate ideas truly makes absolutely no sense.

[–] XnxCuX@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Building off this, im fully capable of having 2 entirely different conversations at once.

Ive been talking to one person at work, stop mid sentence to correct the other crew, and go back to what I was saying with a small reminder.

[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've had two conversations with the same person at the same time.

Really common with text chatting, since they reply to conversation 1 while I'm replying to conversation 2, then we switch.

[–] Opisek@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

At like 3 or 4 simultaneous conversations in different languages things go wrong and I accidentally use the wrong language in one of them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Wizard_Pope@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

Yeah my gf sometimes does this but uses one app for one conversation and another for a different one.

[–] sonic_veemo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

ime they simply don’t think

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SpaceDuck@feddit.org 4 points 1 week ago

It may be more extreme, but fairly often with conversations with my wife, after a while we’re like: “How did we end up at this topic” and then we can backtrack it a number of steps to see how we got at a completely different topic.

It’s kind of like clicking through Wikipedia, you open a page and a few subpages, some of those have different interesting subjects and somehow you went from pollination to ancient Mesopotamian mythology.

I think we’re both fairly “NT” but just curious.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›