this post was submitted on 16 May 2025
165 points (97.1% liked)

World News

46597 readers
2211 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In what could be a significant escalation of U.S. pressure on Mexico, the Trump administration has begun to impose travel restrictions and other sanctions on prominent Mexican politicians whom it believes are linked to drug corruption, U.S. officials said.

all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Lucidlethargy@sh.itjust.works 32 points 2 days ago

This administration literally let El Chapo's family into the country recently.

[–] MuskyMelon@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago

But El Chapo's son and family are aight

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 day ago

Can we do that to American politicians who are also corrupt. No convictions, just hunches and such that they are.

[–] doctortofu@reddthat.com 48 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Are these politicians linked to drug trade more than the Sinaloa cartel? Just asking questions, ya know ;) https://apnews.com/article/el-chapo-sinaloa-cartel-trump-border-harfuch-86572a31c88a216da7cd5f33006a0011

[–] Gates9@sh.itjust.works 3 points 22 hours ago

My theory is that they need operatives to function as a new “Murder Inc.”, i.e. a new clandestine criminal organization that can carry out the overtly illegal acts like murder, extortion, etc. There’s no rational good-faith explanation for this.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Came here to post that.

They're not even hiding it anymore the only way you can believe this shit is if you legit just believe 100% of what they say.

Noem is purging the DOJ of anyone who says the MS13 wasn't a real tattoo. And she won't even say it's real, she just refuses to answer and that's what she wants from the whole DOJ.

Lie, and if caught in a provable way, literally pretend it's not happening.

Shit is very fucked.

[–] IsaamoonKHGDT_6143@lemmy.zip 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

In Mexico, politicians are in cahoots with drug trafficking and are corrupt. They often partner with various cartels in exchange for large sums of money. You might think this is unfounded, but it's not actually true.

But I understand their situation because the DOJ already labels anyone as a criminal, and when they're doing something right, it ends up being confused with something wrong.

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

You might think this is unfounded, but it’s not actually true.

No one is saying differently...

It's like anywhere else: some corrupt, some fighting corruption.

You seem to keep misunderstanding what people are saying and trying to extrapolate it into something big.

But you're starting off with flawed logic

[–] Linktank@lemmy.today 37 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Didn't they literally just help some cartel family members move across the border unimpeded? Pick a lane, assholes.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Pick a lane, assholes.

Why? Nobody is stopping him so why the fuck would he?

[–] IsaamoonKHGDT_6143@lemmy.zip 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Rather, it was the ones who requested asylum, but in exchange, they're going to provide information that will be useful to the Trump administration. For what purpose? I don't know, but it could be that nothing will happen, or something will.

[–] empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago

but in exchange, they’re going to provide ~~information~~ money

[–] Pistcow@lemm.ee 30 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I'd love if Mexico detained Ted Cruz next time he goes to Cancun during hurricane season.

If they could detain him indefinitely, that would be great.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

How else can they justify calling cartels an invasion? They have to manufacture a political entity that puts the government of Mexico in the same bucket as the cartels to be able to make the claim we are at war/there has been a foreign invasion… so basically protection, again, attacking others for being the thing you are has got to be one of the most unevolved mentalities yet it sure seems to work

[–] Archangel1313@lemm.ee 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Did they get this information from the cartel members they gave special immigration access to?

[–] EON_GuG@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

Yes, but they're relatives of El Chapo who sought asylum from the FBI. Although they already had information, they just needed to tie up the loose ends.

Note: This doesn't mean I support the Trump administration; I'm just providing information.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not that they could accurately identify who is corrupt, but there are definitely politicians in bed with the cartel.

[–] Zenith@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Would you consider this to be systemic? Or could you guess how high it goes? I would imagine it’s mostly mayoral level positions, being “in bed” can mean almost anything when the threat to your life is sufficient enough, that’s important to remember, it would be the politicians who are more physically isolated higher up I’d be worried about. At the end of the day unless it was the president, or who ever has the power to declare war in Mexico, is on the take it wouldn’t be sufficient to link Mexican politicians and leadership to an invasion, which is what they have been claiming the cartel activity is, a foreign invasion

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

I’d say systemic. Long history. I wouldn’t be surprised if people in congress and senate had been corrupted by cartels. There have been accusations towards past presidents. Sure some of it can be from threats to their lives or lives of loved ones. Just saying the corruption exists throughout their government.

[–] Loduz_247@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago (3 children)

Are Mexican politicians more transparent, equal, or more corrupt than American politicians?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Are AOC and Trump the same?

Mexico is like America, there's variation.

There's a lot of corruption, but a lot of brave fighters. Down there they literally put their life on the line to run for office.

[–] IsaamoonKHGDT_6143@lemmy.zip -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Do you really think most candidates are brave?

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

most candidates

Did I say most?

I said:

a lot of brave fighters

Two very different things

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] IsaamoonKHGDT_6143@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 days ago

Why do you say they are more transparent?

[–] MCasq_qsaCJ_234@lemmy.zip 0 points 2 days ago

They are more corrupt.