this post was submitted on 18 May 2025
274 points (98.9% liked)

politics

23538 readers
2232 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump is raging against the Supreme Court after it temporarily blocked his administration from using a centuries-old wartime law to fast-track migrant deportations. On Saturday, Trump ramped up his attacks by highlighting a plan to move “terrorists” near justices’ homes.

“The president should release these terrorists near the Chevy Chase Country Club, with daytime release,” former GOP staffer Mike Davis wrote online. Trump shared the post.

all 46 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 10 points 2 hours ago

Isn't threatening judges like that illegal? Oh silly me, legality is irrelevant

[–] Catma@lemmy.world 8 points 2 hours ago

"Will no one rid me of these turbulent justices?"

[–] Pnut@lemm.ee 10 points 8 hours ago

I guess this means he can't get rid of them.

[–] wanderwisley@lemm.ee 12 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

The high cholesterol in Donny’s body needs to rage terror on him.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 5 points 9 hours ago

Indeed, fueled by cheeseburgers and Diet Cokes.

[–] SnarkoPolo@lemm.ee 31 points 15 hours ago

It's called fascism. Is anyone surprised?

[–] SabinStargem@lemmy.today 12 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)

Justices: "Hey, do you want to become our marshals and uphold our laws?"

Terrorists: "Sure. Where do we get started?"

Justices: "Start with breaking some ICE, ladies and gentlemen."

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

The court is already heavily tilted towards Trump, with at least three of them operating as a virtual rubber stamp to the President.

Meanwhile, the remaining judges don't particularly like or support one another. Roberts and ACB seems happy enough to throw Jackson, Kagan, and Sotomayor under the bus.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 51 points 17 hours ago (2 children)
[–] SnarkoPolo@lemm.ee 12 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

The "news" media is too busy reporting egg prices, people named Kardashian, and of course, lots of sports.

[–] Freshparsnip@lemm.ee 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

I'm proud of not giving a fuck about anyone named Kardashian. Don't particularly care about sports either.

[–] WizardofFrobozz@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Sure, but- if it bleeds, it leads.

[–] ZoopZeZoop@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago

This reminds me of a song I like called "The Piano that Jack Filled."

[–] xenomor@lemmy.world 109 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago) (6 children)

I’m sure he’s just joking. I wish someone would fucking kill this prick already. See, I just did it too. I’m joking about someone blowing the president’s fucking head clean off. See how humor works in the US? I’m just following the president’s lead here.

[–] OldManBOMBIN@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago

That's funny. It reminds me of this joke about Donald Trump getting picked up by the cartels and then they stab him to death with screwdrivers, slowly, over a period of days, and then the footage ends up on LiveLeak or something? I can't remember the whole thing, unfortunately. I think there was something about wild dogs fucking the holes, too? Man my memory sucks.

[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 49 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Just make sure you arent posting pebbles in the shape of numbers on a beach, that one can actually get you in trouble.

[–] GuyFawkes@midwest.social 7 points 10 hours ago

Clearly a line too far!

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

You know... with how incompetent the secret service has been lately.... they'd probably miss this thing:

And, getting hit by lightning is an act of god right, right?

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 19 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

Fun fact they actually foiled a plot on Obama where the guy was building some sort of microwave-based "death ray." He was going to mount it inside a panel van.

[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 10 points 18 hours ago (2 children)

How has this not been made into a movie yet?

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 4 points 9 hours ago

The Day of the Jackal, but I recommend the original book Frederick Forsyth (1971) and movie produced in 1973.

[–] jonne@infosec.pub 3 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Probably don't want to give anyone any ideas

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

that idea has already been had, so it might as well happen.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 3 points 15 hours ago (1 children)

Well, I don't mind making jokes because it's basically "just" a giant taser hooked up to a massive pulsed power source. it shoots a wire at something, which then makes contact with ground and it dumps all the stored power through that wire, turning it to plasma and making lightning.

that tower isn't just to raise the turret up- that is the cap bank. Getting that thing anywhere near Trump would be a shocking display of incompetence. or complicity.

also, I don't have the resources or expertise to build it. lols.

[–] Carmakazi@lemmy.world 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I looked up my example afterwards. It was actually x-ray based, so they wouldn't actually need to expose the device for it to work, and it would have feasibly fit in a van.

The two accomplices were also KKK members and they seemed more focused on killing random Muslims with it and going for Obama was more of an aspiration. But as delusional morons do, they overextended and got multiple undercover agents involved in their plot before they actually did any harm.

[–] FuglyDuck@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago

The best escape plans always involve getting multiple federal agencies into a pissing match!

No. Really!

(/s. They’re usually smart enough to cooperate long enough to get you someplace “cozy”)

[–] paraphrand@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Just harmless ironic humor. No one should bother you.

[–] Gregg@lemm.ee 6 points 18 hours ago

And if anyone does then comedy is truly dead!

First they came for the dick jokes, but I said nothing because my act didn’t include dick jokes

Then they came for the [ethnicity] people be like jokes, but I said nothing because my act didn’t include [ethnicity] people be like jokes

Etc

[–] redsand@lemmy.dbzer0.com 37 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I live in the dumbest movie I've ever seen.

[–] aceshigh@lemmy.world 1 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

We past Idiocracy on day 1.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

The president in Idiocracy was generally reform minded and receptive to evidence-based argument and policy.

[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 64 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I kind of wish he would do something like this so maybe, just maybe the court would start taking him seriously as the threat he is.

[–] Zerlyna@lemmy.world 24 points 21 hours ago

Word. They just aren’t getting it.

[–] frustrated_phagocytosis@fedia.io 31 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

No, don't release the terrorists, please.... Honestly though, even if they were full fledged terrorists, what does he think they are going to do if they just release them from custody near a judge's house? Are they in any way motivated or equipped to go commit crimes against them? They aren't homing pigeons you can deploy against your political enemies.

[–] Two2Tango@lemmy.ca 1 points 9 hours ago

Trump's Suicide Squad

[–] SpikesOtherDog@ani.social 26 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

Donald Trump is threatening a planned attack against Supreme Court Justices. He is planning to release people with instructions to cause harm. Basically, he will be deputizing prisoners, possibly in exchange to assassinate his political opponents for the prisoner's freedom.

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 9 hours ago

Imagine if literally any other human alive said this shit.

[–] dhork@lemmy.world 26 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago) (1 children)

He already did release a bunch of terrorists with orders to target his enemies. They're all the J6ers he pardoned.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 5 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Tons of them have been re-arrested already, though. He needs fresh meat

[–] PancakesCantKillMe@lemmy.world 4 points 16 hours ago

I’ve only heard of like three getting arrested and one killed by cops.

Tons of them are getting re-hired as Brownshirts for sure.

[–] PattyMcB@lemmy.world 2 points 19 hours ago

Felonious acts by a felon?!

You don't say!

[–] Vegasvator@lemmy.today 5 points 19 hours ago

A whisper of a murder for a pardon would be all it takes. He doesn't even have to whisper though since it would be an official act and ok for the president to do.