this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
1575 points (98.0% liked)

Microblog Memes

8568 readers
3081 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

  1. Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
  2. Be nice.
  3. No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
  4. Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 5) 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] drmoose@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Dumb take because inaccuracies and lies are not unique to LLMs.

half of what you’ll learn in medical school will be shown to be either dead wrong or out of date within five years of your graduation.

https://retractionwatch.com/2011/07/11/so-how-often-does-medical-consensus-turn-out-to-be-wrong/ and that's 2011, it's even worse now.

Real studying is knowning that no source is perfect but being able to craft a true picture of the world using the most efficient tools at hand and like it or not, objectively LLMs are pretty good already.

[–] Awesomo85@sh.itjust.works -4 points 2 months ago

If we are talking about critical thinking, then I would argue that using AI to battle the very obvious shift that most instructors have taken, (that being the use of AI as much as possible to plan out lessons, grade, verify sources.......you know, the job they are being paid to do? Which, by the way, was already being outsourced to whatever tools they had at their disposal. No offense TAs.) as natural progression.

I feel it still shows the ability to adapt to a forever changing landscape.

Isn't that what the hundred-thousand dollar piece of paper tells potential employers?

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip -4 points 2 months ago

Using AI doesn't remove the ability to fact check though.

It is a tool like any other. I would also be weary about doctors using a random medical book from the 1700s to write their thesis and take it at face value.

[–] Tabooki@lemm.ee -5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (14 children)

Did the same apply when calculators came out? Or the Internet?

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›