this post was submitted on 19 May 2025
1359 points (98.8% liked)

People Twitter

7001 readers
2066 users here now

People tweeting stuff. We allow tweets from anyone.

RULES:

  1. Mark NSFW content.
  2. No doxxing people.
  3. Must be a pic of the tweet or similar. No direct links to the tweet.
  4. No bullying or international politcs
  5. Be excellent to each other.
  6. Provide an archived link to the tweet (or similar) being shown if it's a major figure or a politician.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] blacklisted@lemmy.org 3 points 1 day ago

Revanced to overcome some subscriptions.

[–] x4740N@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Try Linux, I just recently installed fedora on dual boot

But be aware that it's not all hunky-dory because I'm still figuring out how to get nvidia drivers working after trying solutions I found online and I'm still trying to figure out how to get hdr working in gnome and there's also the fact that kde plasma keeps freezing after a short time so I'm stuck on gnome

Installation was fine though, I was scared I was going to fuck something up with dual boot

[–] truxnell@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

Give bazzite a go, it's Fedora atomic but has NVIDIA and game features baked into the image.

Life's too short to try and manage NVIDIA drivers on linux

[–] _____@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago

I liked the look of KDE plasma and used it when I first started with Linux but it is a buggy mess and extremely bloated. It feels like it's stuck trying to be Windows 7 aero.

As for NV I use Nvidia as well and I haven't had any issues on CachyOS with Nvidia's actual "open" drivers (not neuveau)

[–] Soapbox1858@lemm.ee 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only excuse for subscription model is when there is cloud storage/sync or server provided functions that are a core part of the software.

If I didn't rely heavily on the cloud storage and syncing part of Lightroom for editing photos seamlessly on desktop, mobile, and web, then I would already have dropped Adobe for Darktable and a pirated copy of Photoshop CS2 for when I need to print.

[–] GooberEar@lemmy.wtf 2 points 1 day ago

I'm glad to see you mention that, I was going to make a similar comment. I figure it's a message that's probably well understood here on the fediverse, but outside of this space not so much.

I think there's also an argument to be made for charging subscriptions based on overall maintenance needs. Upgrades, updates, bug fixes, and things of that nature take time and can also cost money.

However, overall, there are way too many subscription based apps that just don't seem justified. If I buy version 2.3 of AppXYZ, and as long as I stick to that version nor need any online functionality, I just don't see a valid excuse for a subscription, other than pure greed on the developers' part.

[–] detun3d@lemm.ee 4 points 1 day ago

Picard would be ashamed.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago

Finding economic rents is the core of capitalism. It's so iconic even Adam Smith railed against it

SANE & MATURE ≠ "Boomer"

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago
[–] Pika@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

they just need to outlaw subscription based services on services that don't need it.

And no continuous support is not a valid subscription reason, if you want to charge support separate that's fair to do but this pay 60$ a year "because it's a continuous development" needs to go away.

Same with the "pay a rent for a building", it's just money drain. Being a landlord should not be allowed to be for profit, and should be heavily regulated. If you wanna rent? Sure, but at max it should be equivalent to costs the building has, and restricted to only apartment complexes. So annoying that you can't find property anymore to actually /own/ because a handful of rental companies can just write a blank check and buy it all.

[–] piccolo@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

if you want to charge support separate that's fair to do but this pay 60$ a year "because it's a continuous development" needs to go away

Can i pay extra to not have continuous updates that often breaks shit?

[–] andybytes@programming.dev 2 points 1 day ago

When you have a world of billionaires, everybody's reaching out their hands, begging, and shaking ass. This is called the Gambler's Economy. Where weak men rule over those that work and produce value.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
  1. Definitely gonna keep my subscriptions as minimal as I can, like I currently am: just a VPN. Obviously I have a few others I'll need in the future like utilities, internet, and phone, but those are the bare minimum you need since you can scrape by without paying a dime for content thanks to piracy, so long as you are careful.
  2. I have a couple of ones that I'd say are both high on the list ( no idea which is higher because they're both pretty annoying to me ).

The first is that when I do dishes at home, I put certain things a very specific way when filling the dishwasher and putting things away, which is why I absolutely hate when other people do dishes. I'll deal with other people doing the dishes, but then I always feel like I gotta go and put things back where they belong when I'm not the one to put the dishes away.

The second is more furry fandom specific. So, when it comes to fursuits, some people might ditch the fursuit head and just maybe wear the paws or other pieces of it if it's not a single piece costume. My gripe is specifically that: not wearing the head. I don't care if you poodle ( wear a partial and show some skin ), talk in suit, or whatever, but I think it's extremely disrespectful to the character your suit is based off of, whether it's your fursona, OC, an adopt, liberty suit, whatever, to not wear the head at a bare minimum. It's why my opinion the bare minimum you should do for a fursuit commission should be the head.

Did you have a stroke while writing this?

[–] applemao@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

Why i wont use iRacing. Sucks that it's so popular.

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›