this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
499 points (98.4% liked)

Technology

70847 readers
3348 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] kbal@fedia.io 8 points 1 week ago

Makes sense to me. AI bullshit generators may be worse than useless for most of the things people try to do with them, but they might just be the perfect tool for rationalizing the systematic looting of formerly productive companies by private equity.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

No human should work in a call center

[–] TheRealKuni@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Having worked in a call center (doing survey research) during college, there are a lot of people employed by such places who really wouldn’t have many employment options anywhere else.

I remember saying, while there, that the entire industry would be replaced by AI in 10-15 years. They all scoffed, saying they had ways to get people to answer surveys that an AI wouldn’t be able to do. I told them they were being naive.

Here we are.

That said, I do worry about some of those people. Just because they were borderline unemployable doesn’t mean they were worthless.

[–] Bloomcole@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

doesn’t mean they were worthless

Not what I said, on the contrary.
It's a horrible mindnumbing job and anyone deserves better.
The avg of employment is 6 months.
Some don't make their targets and get fired, most find a less shitty job.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago

There was a lot of talk about that when the call centers were sprouting up: generally poor jobs, minimum wage, and liable to be outsourced or ai’d. They were generally put places where there were no real options so those towns are going to suffer when it all goes away

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I worked in one. It was just a job and not that bad.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The hardest thing to believe is that call centers still had humans somewhere to call/answer calls

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 6 points 1 week ago

Wait, it’s all scams?!

[–] AA5B@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

No one should have to work in a call center, but I’m still hopeful about this being a good place for ai. Compared to crappy voice menus we have today, there’s a lot of potential

A huge part of the problem with voice menus is how tightly they’re scripted. They can only work for narrow use cases where you’re somehow knowledgeable enough to find the magic phrasing while being ignorant enough to have simple use cases and only do things the way they thought of.

Ai has the potential to respond to natural language and reply with anything in a knowledge base, even synthesize combinations. It could be much better than scripted voice menus are: more importantly it could be cheaper to implement so might actually happen.

I actually just did an evaluation of such a tool for internal support. This is for software engineers and specific to our company so not something you’re going to find premade. We’ve been collecting stuff in a wiki and just needed to point the agent at the wiki. The ai part was very successful, even if you think of it as a glorified search feature. It’s good at turning natural language questions into exactly what you need, and we just need to keep throwing stuff into the wiki!

Unfortunately I had to reject it for failing on the basics. For example it was decent at guiding you to write a work ticket when needed but there was no way to configure a url for our internal ticketing system. And there was no way to tell it to shut up.

[–] MangoCats@feddit.it 5 points 1 week ago

Compared to crappy voice menus we have today, there’s a lot of potential

It's easy to get above rock bottom. Today's voice menus are already openly abusive of the customers.

Oh, demoralizing thought, when the AI call center agent becomes intentionally abusive... and don't think that companies, and especially government agencies, won't do that on purpose.

I have actually had semi-positive experiences with AI chat bot front ends, they're less afraid to refer to an actual human being who might know something as opposed to the call center front line humans who seem to be afraid they might lose their job if they admit the truth: that they have absolutely no clue how to help you.

Shifting the balance, drop the number of virtually untrained humans in the system by half, train the remaining ones twice as much, and let AI fill in for routing you to a hopefully appropriate "specialist."

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] muusemuuse@lemm.ee 5 points 1 week ago

God I cannot wait for this AI bubble to pop.

[–] MyOpinion@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] oxysis@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 week ago

So bright we had to remove the lampshade!

[–] Loduz_247@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Could the Big Four be in danger?

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›