this post was submitted on 07 Jun 2025
1063 points (91.2% liked)

Technology

71084 readers
3031 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] MystikIncarnate@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 hour ago

I disagree.

  1. You already have a government space agency. Maybe give them more funding so they don't have to rely on space-x to get their stuff into orbit?

  2. There's a national telecom network already in place. It at least has the potential to be faster and more reliable, if it isn't already... At least compared to low earth orbit satellite coverage.

There's no good reason to continue providing Elon or his companies with any government handouts. Pull that funding and give it to.... I dunno, students who have more debt than homeowners with a mortgage..... NASA.... Literally anything that helps people?

[–] TheBannedLemming@lemmy.world 3 points 1 hour ago

I am not saying that I don't agree with you. But this country is still not even close to considering nationalizing its own telecommunication infrastructure. Much less a privately held space company and a service of communication satellites. A large chunk of America believes that a for-profit business model for every good and service possible in life is the best course of action.

[–] Knightfox@lemmy.world 4 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

A lot of people are calling this a bailout for Elon, but in reality it would be a seizure. Elon doesn't want to let go of Starlink and the US likely wouldn't pay him what it's worth to take it over.

What people seem to be missing is the precedent this would set. It's all well and good when we empower the office of the president to seize a private company we don't like, but after we give them that power what's to stop them from seizing other businesses?

XYZ company refuses to get rid of their DEI policy because the shareholders voted to keep it? Well now the orange man can seize it.

Let's not forget that previously it took 2/3rd majority to confirm presidential appointments, but the Senate under Obama decided to change that rule to 50% to get past Republican objections. The result of this is all these shit appointments Trump has passed with 51% of the Senate, none of them would have gotten by if the Democrats hadn't made a precedent for changing the rules.

No, we should regain control of our nation from fascists (this does not mean just replace the President), then nationalize SpaceX and Starlink, and make telecoms public utilities.

[–] hexonxonx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

Starlink should be globalized. A planet only needs one low-altitude orbiting communications network. Better to standardize the technology and platform and let them contribute to one system than to have a dozen identical competing systems crashing into each other and fucking things up for everyone.

[–] michaelmrose@lemmy.world 0 points 6 hours ago

There is no such thing as something being "globalized" The UN for instance is a debating club where the majority of the seats represent individual dictators who dominate but do not speak for their countries citizens.

The idea of 50 countries collectively providing 0% of the funds should determine the mission is somewhat laughable. Also no country on earth has a process by which foreign dictators can seize or direct a company run out of their nation.

[–] frenchfryenjoyer@lemmings.world 6 points 7 hours ago

There's already NASA which gets piss poor funding iirc

[–] why0y@lemmy.ml 2 points 5 hours ago

No I would not like taxpayer dollars to buy out Elons shit shows.

Hard pass. Thanks no thanks jacobin

[–] minorkeys@lemmy.world 20 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

You have NASA FFS. Just fund it.

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 2 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

NASA is too beholden to politics... You can't do 7 year builds and missions when the Senate flips every 4 years and has to kill everything the other side did on principle that it has a D or R attached to it. Everything is political.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Angular2575@lemmy.ml 3 points 8 hours ago

No, we already have NASA

[–] gamer@lemm.ee 7 points 11 hours ago

Throw Musk in prison for his many documented crimes, but don't support this kind of dictator shit.

[–] theywilleatthestars@lemmy.world 8 points 12 hours ago

Best time would've been when he pulled that stunt in Ukraine, second best time is now

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

I wouldn't nationalize anything long as the orange could possibly profit off it

[–] RhondaSandTits@lemmy.sdf.org 30 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Don't give bail-outs to billionaires.

Then don't reimburse him.

load more comments
view more: next ›