this post was submitted on 08 Jun 2025
821 points (99.3% liked)

politics

23989 readers
3786 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 212 points 1 day ago (2 children)

It has begun. Trump unleashing the army against the population fighting against his gestapo.

[–] AngrySquirrel@lemm.ee 65 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said in a post on X that the Defense Department is "mobilizing the National Guard IMMEDIATELY to support federal law enforcement in Los Angeles. And, if violence continues, active duty Marines at Camp Pendleton will also be mobilized — they are on high alert." ~ABC News

They are already threatening to send in Marines...

[–] BigBenis@lemmy.world 70 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They've been jerking themselves off to deploying the military against California for decades. This is their fantasy come true and they can hardly wait.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 80 points 1 day ago (4 children)

I am very fearful that many protesters will be murdered in the coming days.

And things will deteriorate quickly

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Daft_ish@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Doesn't trump lose horribly every time he goes after CA?

He'd have better luck waiting for something to go down in the Midwest, but yeah, w/e good luck.

[–] altphoto@lemmy.today 7 points 21 hours ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Trump_Ocean_Resort_Baja_Mexico

He fucked up every investor by around $200,000.0 each. Lots of love for this guy to go around. Somehow he keeps buying into higher and higher places. Purchasing the seat of the US presidency may not be the end.....China has a heck of a lot of people to fuck with!

[–] NikkiDimes@lemmy.world 9 points 22 hours ago

Especially in a town known for its history of riots. LA is ready to kick some nazi ass at a moments notice.

[–] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 13 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Doesn't the California National Guard report to the Governor?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres@lemmy.world 131 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Whatever side of this issue you fall on, you should at least know that, tactics-wise, joining with the LAPD to do raids in Eastside LA is not going to work how you think it will. There’s movies, albums, books, historic moments in living memory, etc. that warn about that. Start in Sacramento or wherever. Don’t expect East LA to care about your “authority.”

[–] arrow74@lemm.ee 107 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (10 children)

The powerful and their goons seem to have forgotten that sure they can roll up anywhere with an army and overpower protesters, but that's not going to solve this. It's just going to start a true resistance.

There have been few times in history where resistance forces have fought state forces on an open battlefield.

As seen historically, a typical resistance force will harrass the enemy. Bomb their buildings, stockpiles, and infrastructure. Wait until the state goons are alone, at their homes, at the bar, in a grocery store and then that's when they kill them.

All sending the national gaurd in to kill protesters will result in is a true resitance forming.

The powerful have forgotten what it was like to be afraid to leave their fortresses

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] HorseTesselator@midwest.social 101 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (23 children)

Maybe a bit of a hot take, but I think Trump is also doing this at least partly to distract from his spat with Musk's Epstein implications. Not to mention Trump's upcoming parade. Also, keep in mind that 2,000 Nat'l guard troops is surprisingly low, especially for an area the size of L.A. In '92 they brought in almost 10,000.

I'd be lying if I said I wasn't nervous about this, too, but personally I believe people need to keep their cool, here. I'm seeing a lot of doom spiraling and panicking all over the place online and we need to be mindful of how this affects us mentally and emotionally.

We're in the long game.

[–] NotASharkInAManSuit@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I think the lack of numbers is intentional. Trump and the Heritage Foundation want a violent response to justify an even more violent reaction. They’re looking to have the national guard be not enough to make it look like immigrants and the left are a threat to be dealt with and showing them hurting National Guard troops would elevate the narrative to a military threat at the civilian level. They want someone to brick a national guardsmen, I’d wager they want a few guardsmen to die, it would give them everything they need, they could declare martial law and stop elections, then they send in the marines.

[–] jjjalljs@ttrpg.network 3 points 20 hours ago

There are good odds we'll get an iconic photo out of this, like the Kent State massacre. But I don't know if we're so post-truth that anyone would care.

Photo I'm thinking of is on https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kent_State_shootings

load more comments (22 replies)
[–] BigMacHole@sopuli.xyz 75 points 1 day ago

You mean the Man who Deployed Secret Police in his FIRST TERM is Deploying the National Guard in his SECOND TERM? I did NAZI This coming!

[–] prole@lemmy.blahaj.zone 49 points 1 day ago (1 children)

They've been salivating for an opportunity like this. I bet they thought it would have happened already

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›