this post was submitted on 21 Jun 2025
735 points (96.8% liked)

Technology

71717 readers
3627 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kevnyon@lemmy.world 9 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

I wish I could do this, but trying to convince people to ditch an app they've never had problems with and where they all have their family, friends, work groups and school groups already mashed together, how do you convince them? Its not even about me convincing my friends or family, its about everyone else doing the same and when everyone has so many contacts in WhatsApp, that number starts to snowball real quick. Its just not feasible to try and explain this to someone who literally doesn't care. I mean even though I myself know what Meta is and how Zuck is complete asshole, I still can't switch off of WhatsApp because nobody I know is on Signal and I'd just be alone there. What's the point? WhatsApp is pretty much the first app anyone installs on their phone (regardless of platform), they're not gonna switch now.

[–] ieGod@lemmy.zip 2 points 2 hours ago

Yep. I know the details. I'm tech savvy enough, but I use what my contacts use, and I'm not leaving WhatsApp. Same goes for youtube. The content I consume is there. There is no suitable alternative until the content creators switch. It's not really about the technology at all.

[–] oakward@feddit.org 1 points 2 hours ago

Just ditch WhatsApp. Don't give in to social pressure to install malware on your phone

[–] Armand1@lemmy.world 14 points 6 hours ago (3 children)

The exit plan from WhatsApp is quite simple. Start by installing Signal and setting it up – it takes only a couple of minutes. Then, resume any WhatsApp conversations on Signal if that person is already a Signal user. If they are not, then switch to regular text messaging and gently suggest to that person to switch over to Signal.

Sadly for me, this doesn't really work for some relatives as

  • They live abroad and the cost of sending text messages abroad is not insignificant
  • Some are so tech un-savvy that even installing a new app by themselves is too much.

All I can do for those relatives is to leave WhatsApp installed but take away basically every permission I can, including running in the background.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

They live abroad and the cost of sending text messages abroad is not insignificant

Signal is free just like whats app. For text, calls, and video. So that isn't a problem.

I too have friends and family in different countries, one of which is crazy about whatsapp. I simply tell them this is how we are going to do things now, and walk them through it. It is not hard. If they can't do it, well then we don't need to communicate this way. Whatsapp is not an option. It is that simple.

[–] Nima@leminal.space 3 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Signal is not capable of SMS and quite a lot of people still use it.

yes, i know SMS isn't secure at all. but if the option is "keep in touch with close family" or "don't keep in touch" they will probably choose the former if they want to keep that.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 4 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

I would rather SMS than use WhatsApp. But even then if my family is far away, why am texting them at all very often? With the time zone differences I'll call or email, or nothing. It's weird how people got along just fine with letters that took weeks and suddenly we now need instant communication for some reason?

[–] Nima@leminal.space 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

we used to be fine with candles and stinky lanterns filled with perfectly good kerosene too. who tf needs electricity? 🤨

on the topic of family connection, I can't speak to your family experience. only my own. and our family group chat is pretty damn active.

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 1 points 37 minutes ago

Did you get everyone to settle on the same thing, like Signal? We are spread out over about 8 countries, and with all the different phone numbers and plans, we use various methods, with several of us on Signal. Some on whatsapp, some on messenger. So we are not coordinated enough for a group chat. Which is fine, I dont really need to know everything all the time, we catch up when can, or get into small video chats occasionally. Luckily we do tend to physically see each other somewhat frequently.

[–] qarbone@lemmy.world 2 points 3 hours ago

How is that weird? You can be fine with suboptimal stuff, and recognize it's suboptimal. Some people like their relatives and wished they could talk together more readily. Letters were just the fastest (while economical) method of doing that for a while.

[–] InfiniteHench@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago

How did they get WhatsApp installed? Is a FaceTime or other video option available? Never give up, never surrender

[–] NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip 2 points 5 hours ago

They live abroad and the cost of sending text messages abroad is not insignificant

Signal is free just like whats app. For text, calls, and video.

[–] rdri@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

I can't call ethical an app that relies on Electron.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 3 points 2 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ddash@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 minutes ago

I think it is more of a hill than a goalpost.

[–] mintiefresh@lemmy.ca 32 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

Wish more of my contact list would switch over to Signal. It's nearly the same. I don't see why it's so hard for some people to just start using Signal instead of WhatsApp.

Oh well.

[–] Scolding7300@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

"But why, everyone is on WhatsApp", and also a lot of businesses. "Privacy? I've got nothing to hide, what are they gonna do eith my info?"

[–] meliaesc@lemmy.world 2 points 4 hours ago

I tried switching my family over, but being unable to install it on a second device or tablet was a deal breaker.

[–] Kekzkrieger@feddit.org 30 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Because people are beyond stupid. "i dont want to download another app" - while having an app for almost every other store and bullshit game and whatever

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 11 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

I think what they really mean is "I don't want another account".

[–] FinalRemix@lemmy.world 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Hell I've been getting rid of accounts lately. Feels good.

[–] victorz@lemmy.world 7 points 6 hours ago

It's super cathartic, I agree. Feels extra good when it's big tech and fascist-owned as well.

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 9 points 10 hours ago

My dad won't switch from Facebook messenger so now we have to talk via unencrypted sms

[–] network_switch@lemmy.ml 13 points 13 hours ago

Ya it’d be better if it didn’t require a phone number but it’s a solid start as it’s build up a user base over the past decade. Matrix is good but I know far less people that use it and it’ll be a long time of growing with nerdy/geeky communities before it starts getting more mainstream users

[–] Nima@leminal.space 18 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

signal requires a phone number and won't even allow you to send sms to those that aren't on signal.

its better, but still not great.

[–] TeddE@lemmy.world 26 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It used to function as a fallback SMS/MMS messenger (like how iMessage does) but when Google started moving to convert Android from SMS/MMS to RCS Signal made the hard decision to cut the fallback functionality rather than follow Google's new framework.

I personally hope once the dust settles Signal designs a RCS engine and restores the fallback functionality.

[–] oppy1984@lemm.ee 6 points 11 hours ago

Yeah killing the sms function was basically a deal breaker for me, no matter how much I tried I could only get three people to use Signal, the rest were all sms. When the sms feature was removed 2 of the 3 dropped Signal completely, so now the only person I know who still uses it is my mom and even she still flips back and forth between Signal and Google messages when texting me.

I still have Signal on my phone and suggest it people when they ask how to contact me, but everyone just wants to text my phone number.

[–] anachrohack@lemmy.world 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

If you need to send sms to someone not on signal, why not just send them an sms

[–] Nima@leminal.space 3 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

if they need my phone number to have an account anyway, they can offer both.

i dont need more apps that do the same thing. i need less.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago (1 children)

It's arguably a very bad idea for a secure messenger to also provide an SMS interface, since those are basically cleartext

[–] Nima@leminal.space 1 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

exactly. so I'm wondering what the purpose is for its need.

(edit: apologies- the phone number. needing the phone number.)

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago* (last edited 5 hours ago) (1 children)

What? You use a secure messenger to send secure messages. It doesn't make sense for a secure messenger to offer sending insecure messages (SMS).

Edit: oh, you're probably referring to why it requires a phone number. This seems to be due to abuse/spam prevention, as otherwise creating new accounts to spam people with is basically free.

[–] Nima@leminal.space 1 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

using the phone number is still a pretty unnecessary risk, imho.

there's no real need for it any longer.

[–] FooBarrington@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Do you have a better approach to prevent spam in mind? Without a barrier of entry it becomes a serious issue.

[–] Nima@leminal.space 1 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Spam prevention? Ive got spam on Signal. Having your phone number be the barrier of entry doesn't make Signal a flawless app.

and considering i can just plug a google voice number in, I'm not sure its the best barrier.

[–] Arcane2077@sh.itjust.works 45 points 17 hours ago (5 children)

I like Signal. I even got all my close friends and family on it, specifically to message me because I won't use whatsapp. The PIN reminders are annoying it enough to be legitimately holding it back from mass appeal imho

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 109 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (17 children)

After Trump was elected and inaugurated, Signal has finally been gaining some steam here in the Netherlands.

It's still an American company, so it's not ideal. But it's still significantly better better than letting a tech giant like Facebook have control over the most commonly used chat app.

WhatsApp needs to go and Signal is the most likely way in which we can achieve that. We can worry about the American elephant in the room later.

load more comments (17 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›