this post was submitted on 27 Jun 2025
479 points (97.2% liked)

Technology

71998 readers
2735 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] snausagesinablanket@lemmy.world 74 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Its to use the employees to train AI to replace them and they know it.

Nah its just part of the MLM scheme that is "AI". Its useful because they said it would be useful. Its worth the investment because it cost a lot of money. Once you realize that all these companies care about is revenue and "growth" then it all clicks. It doesnt have to work or be profitable, it just needs to look good to investers.

They will even go as far as firing loads of workers and saying publicly that they "replaced them with AI" while in reality those workers were just doing something that the company was willing to sacrifice. They just replaced something with nothing to make it look like their magic AI can actually do things.

Cory Doctorow put it better than i ever could: https://pluralistic.net/2025/05/07/rah-rah-rasputin/
The whole post is good but i will just quote this section.

The "boy genius" story is an example of Silicon Valley's storied "reality distortion field," pioneered by Steve Jobs. Like Jobs, Zuck is a Texas marksman, who fires a shotgun into the side of a barn and then draws a target around the holes. Jobs is remembered for his successes, and forgiven his (many, many) flops, and so is Zuck. The fact that pivot to video was well understood to have been a catastrophic scam didn't stop people from believing Zuck when he announced "metaverse."

Zuck lost more than $70b on metaverse, but, being a boy genius Texas marksman, he is still able to inspire confidence from credulous investors. Zuck's AI initiatives generated huge interest in Meta's stock, with investors betting that Zuck would find ways to keep Meta's growth going, despite the fact that AI has the worst unit economics of any tech venture in living memory. AI is a business that gets more expensive as time goes on, and where the market's willingness to pay goes down over time. This makes the old dotcom economics of "losing money on every sale, but making it up in volume" look positively rosy.

[–] irelephant@lemmy.dbzer0.com 30 points 1 day ago (13 children)

Ai definitely can't replace many (if any) microsoft employees.

[–] SpaceRanger13@lemm.ee 31 points 1 day ago

I think shouldn't is better to say than can't. They are definitely going to try.

[–] shadowfax13@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

suits have been replacing long term essential employees with outsourced trash even before in name of global redundancy and efficiency. now they will just the ai buzz word to hide behind.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 22 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Their hope is probably that AI can let current employees bear a greater workload so they can downsize.

[–] tarknassus@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Ding! Any gains in productivity will mean more work for less people.

Anyone who can’t see this coming - I have several bridges for sale.

[–] localme@lemm.ee 1 points 17 hours ago

Yeah and what it should mean is the same productivity (or slightly higher) over fewer hours worked. So everyone can get more of their lives back to go be happy and spend time with their friends and families. Or literally whatever else people would rather being doing besides working all the damn time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] salacious_coaster@infosec.pub 10 points 1 day ago

Microsoft support was already mostly useless. So, yeah, a useless AI probably could replace that, but it would also probably be more expensive.

Not even the guys who call me on the phone to tell me that I have a virus on my computer?

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] etherphon@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

Being judged by a fancy magic 8 ball, the future keeps getting better and better.

[–] dokuz@leminal.space 10 points 1 day ago

I feel like this is going to cause so many problems in the near future. They’re not ready for it and they don’t even know.

[–] Codilingus@sh.itjust.works 35 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Malicious compliance and use it solely for internal emails.

[–] acosmichippo@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

can i send an AI bot to all my Teams meetings? THAT would actually increase my productivity.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Microsoft is in the process of downsizing to the tune of 3% of its global workforce and rising.

Could be they really are unironically cruising towards a CEO overseeing a bunch of spam bot email accounts they're treating as headcount.

[–] atmorous@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The only hope for Microsoft is if Xbox takes over all of Microsoft and transforms the whole company

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Uff@lemmy.world 15 points 1 day ago

At my company too but it's owned by yet another cancerous private equity firm so it was expected.

[–] riskable@programming.dev 16 points 1 day ago

The AI said that trying to reason with you is a waste of precious tokens.

[–] Zoldyck@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

Good luck with that Microsoft

[–] derry@midwest.social 9 points 1 day ago

Yes but can it tell the business why it can't deliver on time with they change the requirements 3 different times?

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›