this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2025
420 points (84.8% liked)

Privacy

3510 readers
131 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

TranscriptA post by [object Object] (@zzt@mas.to) saying: courtesy of @davidgerard@circumstances.run, Proton is now the only privacy vendor I know of that vibe codes its apps: In the single most damning thing I can say about Proton in 2025, the Proton GitHub repository has a “cursorrules” file. They’re vibe-coding their public systems. Much secure! I am once again begging anyone who will listen to get off of Proton as soon as reasonably possible, and to avoid their new (terrible) apps in any case. https://circumstances.run/@davidgerard/114961415946154957

It has a reply by the author saying: in an unsurprising update for those familiar with how Proton operates, they silently rewrote their monorepo’s history to purge .cursor and hide that they were vibe coding: https://github.com/ProtonMail/WebClients/tree/2a5e2ad4db0c84f39050bf2353c944a96d38e07f

given the utter lack of communication from Proton on this, I can only guess they’ve extracted .cursor into an external repository and continue to use it out of sight of the public

(page 4) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old

This guy seems somewhat biased against this Proton feller

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] lIlIlIlIlIlIl@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] hansolo@lemmy.today 6 points 1 week ago

Because 1 coder used Cursor and a bunch of people on Mastadon immediately went to grab the pitchforks because reasons?

How much you want to bet not a single person having a huff about this pays a cent to Proton for anything, and likely doesn't even use them?

[–] independantiste@sh.itjust.works -2 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I can't wait until you guys get real jobs and then realize that every company that is serious about software development heavily pushes for AI tools such as CLINE or Cursor. I use it at work but I wouldn't say I am vibe coding (mainly because it sucks ass). the reason they deleted the file from the repo is unlikely because they don't want people to know they use AI, it's more likely because AI rules files can contain info that you don't want to be made public

[–] TheOneCurly@feddit.online 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

If you're serious about software you push design patterns and code reviews, if you're serious about grifting investors you push LLM nonsense.

[–] independantiste@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I fail to see how those two options are mutually exclusive???

[–] TheOneCurly@feddit.online -3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You only start a project/feature once (hopefully), you either do so from sound basic principals or prompting. You don't get to have multiple first priorities.

once again, you think it's an all or nothing scenario, you can use an LLM while also doing code review and basic principles. You are the one telling the AI what to do, it will execute your instructions as you told it to, to the best of today's LLM's capabilities

[–] galoisghost@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago

mainly because it sucks ass

So many people ignore this and repeat the Big tech PR talking points about AI. I had a colleague enthuse about AI agents, then demonstrate it and say “well it’s currently a little bit shit”

The fuck people! Wake up!

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

All large corpos are pushing this on all of their paper pushers... That's why this AI is called LLM

It is a tool... It is as good as the person using it

[–] Electricd@lemmybefree.net 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It is a tool... It is as good as the person using it

Yea, and people are still mad about it and somehow believe people just copy paste everything without checking

[–] sunzu2@thebrainbin.org 2 points 1 week ago

To be fair, fake news got them work up about how it will take ur jerb...

Anyone one with any w2 slavery experience will quickly asses that ain't true...

But they miss the part where it is a tool and it scale with your skill level. Anyone using to try to get the right answer will fail.

Smart user will uses in the work flow where it helps and just keep doing their job otherwise

It will put pressure on entry level. But it ain't replacing mid level cogs that actually do all the work

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›