this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2025
643 points (96.9% liked)

politics

25208 readers
3182 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] proctor1432@lemmy.world 5 points 33 minutes ago

I mean, he's correct in that both political parties have been bought and paid for by large corporations for a long time. This shouldn't be news, it should be plainly obvious by now.

One party is openly hostile towards the average citizen. The other puts on a friendly mask for the public but is also hostile towards the average citizen. None of them actually give a fuck about the average person. Trump is exceptionally arrogant and aggressive with his goals, but I promise he is far from the first person to have such goals or to exploit the government system for personal gain. He is the first to be so obvious about it, but it has been happening for decades, hidden under the guise of 'security' and other buzz words.

Well, duuuhhh. Is this a new or unique take?

[–] carlossurf@lemmy.ca 18 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

Hes 100% right, she started the campaign great talking about progressive real issues, then when she started changing thats when she started losing support

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 7 points 47 minutes ago* (last edited 47 minutes ago)

No no no. She ran a perfect campaign.

I have it on good authority that she was stabbed in the back by far-left, transgender, pro-Putin antisemites.

Next time - and there will be a next time, it's her turn - she needs to be even more friendly with moderate Republicans and win back the Joe Rogan demographic. The Democrats need their own Jordan Peterson. They need their own Yeomni Park. They need their own Curtis Yarvin. They need their own X, The Everything App.

That is the only way to win the coveted American swing voter.

[–] CatDogL0ver@lemmy.world 1 points 24 minutes ago

We choose the lesser evil. Now, look what happened when people don't act and give up.

[–] SaintNyx@lemmy.world 19 points 16 hours ago

This seems to be how the majority of Democrats in office are and they'll never see themselves as wrong... They just point at Trump and say he's what's wrong. And yeah they're not wrong about that but that doesn't make them right or good either. You get stuck running for a bad candidate or a downright evil candidate. And yeah I voted for Harris. I voted for Biden and Hilary too. Id vote for a literal log of shit on the floor before I voted for Trump, but that doesn't mean I liked the Democratic candidates or that I'm super happy with party. This country isn't set up to make third party candidates an option.. But no...I don't think the Democrats in office will every see themselves as a problem.

[–] Gammelfisch@lemmy.world 12 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Bernie is pointing out one of the major flaws of the Democratic Party and he is way ahead of his time in regard to US politics. Can you imagine if the USA would look at itself like Norway.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 3 points 45 minutes ago* (last edited 45 minutes ago)

An oil producing enthostate governed by a neoliberal plutocracy?

I think we already tried that under Bush, Obama, and Biden.

[–] pjwestin@lemmy.world 86 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Is, "influenced by billionaires," a euphemism for, "she let her uber executive brother-in-law talk her into gutting any economic populism from her campaign in favor of tepid centrist policies that cost her the election and ushered in a new era of American fascism?"

[–] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean I'm not sure Bernie is that woke, much as I love him, but that's pretty much the view from over here.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] AcidiclyBasicGlitch@sh.itjust.works 60 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

I mean, I voted for her, and would vote for her again any day if it meant voting against Trump, but he's not wrong.

She's not really unique in that aspect compared to any other mainstream Democrat vs any outsider or mainstream Republican, and that's probably ~90% of the DNC's problem when it comes to overcoming voter apathy.

Realistically, most people are not expecting Dems to refuse large donations, but accepting a donation should not mean that you then compromise your own values to accommodate 1% of voters on any issue. That's not how a democracy is supposed to work. That's just pay to play.

[–] postmateDumbass@lemmy.world 3 points 11 hours ago

The big money on both sides is invested in the same places.

The rest follows from that.

[–] Auntievenim@lemmy.world 12 points 1 day ago

Its so stupid to me that we've now reached the point that politicians don't even pretend to be public servants anymore. They're just paypigs doing whatever the money wants. Used to be, a campaign donation got you a "hi how are ya" and maybe a thank you card after the election. They sent you money and it was nice of them because you needed it.

Now with kamala, she got the largest grassroots fundraising of any candidate in history and what does she do? Listen to a bunch of rich fucks who gave the maximum contribution. I bet they all voted for Trump too. She's either the most incompetent and gullible politician in american history or the dnc are fascist collaborators. The way she turned away from every popular idea she had makes it seem like she was told to lose. Im sure its been fucking great for her brother tho.

[–] octopus_ink@slrpnk.net 50 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Bernie is correct as per usual.

[–] ano_ba_to@sopuli.xyz 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If only being correct has value with society at large...

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sqgl@sh.itjust.works 6 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Harris said on July 30 that she won’t run for California governor, leaving the door open for a potential 2028 presidential run.

Leaving the door open for her to run again or for someone else? How is being Governor relevant anyhow?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Harris & 95% or more of the democratic party. Outlaw money from politics - lobbying, campaign finance, PACs, political foundations (i.e. Heritage), all of it.

[–] Formfiller@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The DNC is committed to insider trading, corruption and AIPAC. In no way do they represent the interests of the majority. They are rewarded handsomely to play reluctant enabler in the political theater.

[–] fishy@lemmy.today 2 points 19 minutes ago

Unfortunate truth here. The modern dnc exists solely to enrich their donors.

[–] mrdown@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

I mean he is right

load more comments
view more: next ›