Pyongyang plans to send 6,000 troops, up to 100 tanks and APCs to Russia, and is already supplying 40% of its artillery ammo and weapons used in the war against Ukraine, Budanov says.

top 16 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I just need six thousand more ~~victims~~ troops bro.

I'm totally winning bro, this is just finishing touches bro.

I promise they won't be turned into sunflowers bro.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, don’t know about that last point, neither leader cares if they live or die.

[–] MushuChupacabra@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

While true, as a despot, I'd want to supress and ruin the lives of my citizens versus loaning them out for another despot to slaughter.

[–] Lemmyoutofhere@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But what if you could get a solid gold toilet for them?

[–] Chakravanti@monero.town 2 points 1 week ago

My shit is diamonds and the will scrape the fuck out of your solid ~~atoms~~ Adams.

[–] KindnessIsPunk@lemmy.ca 25 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Is this not an act of war that violates the terms of the aid the US provides them?

[–] imrighthere@lemmy.ca 27 points 1 week ago (2 children)

russia and nk are us allies now.

[–] CheeseNoodle@lemmy.world 11 points 1 week ago

The US capital is currently occupied by a military force under the control of a Russian agent. I'd say its more like NK and US are Russian vassals at this point. (Very hyperbole but not as much as I'd like)

[–] FilthyHands@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

We were never at war with Eastasia.

[–] HappySkullsplitter@lemmy.world 13 points 1 week ago

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We should go back to the days when leaders fought one-on-one. Instead, they send minions to die. Black Sabbath and Pink Floyd both said something or other about this. Oh well, guess a bunch of people have to die.

[–] Flax_vert@feddit.uk 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Wasn't this what the whole David vs Goliath thing was about? Except they weren't two leaders but just subjects

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago

I could be wrong, but I think Goliath challenged the Jews to one-on-one combat because he was a giant (he was def a "giant;" the part I could be wrong about is whether he challenged or his leader / master challenged). I couldn't say for sure; I'm an atheist and primarily study the first two centuries of christianity (it's a fascinating topic).

[–] flambonkscious@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 week ago

I'm missing a lot of details on the matter but I wonder if this is the most credible way for the troops to escape, without having their family slaughtered for defecting?

[–] Aqarius@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I have to say, if three years ago you asked me which country has its logistical shit together for a modern war, DRPK would not have come to mind.

And yet, here we are.

[–] Pilferjinx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

And they know how to parade!