this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2025
477 points (98.6% liked)

Technology

74693 readers
2857 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9tr6gyp3@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

Wait until they sue Mississippi

[–] 58008@lemmy.world 15 points 5 days ago

The nihilist school shooters of the world are way more litigious than I thought possible.

[–] General_Effort@lemmy.world 11 points 5 days ago

The complaint is hilarious. So on brand.

I guess they'll win. It's going to be interesting to see what happens then.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.ml -3 points 4 days ago (4 children)

I don’t really get this.

Whether I like the UK’s act, they are free to set the laws of their land. So if foreign websites don’t want to comply, the UK is also free to order its ISPs to block the site.

Which kids will then circumvent with VPN.

And so on …

[–] Xatolos@reddthat.com 4 points 4 days ago

From what I've read about this lawsuit is that the UK isn't blocking the site, they are sending them daily fines for not IDing every user. The 2 sites are arguing back that they aren't UK companies and don't even have any business/physical presence in the UK, so as they have nothing to do with anything of the UK then UK laws and legal threats have no meaning to them. Which I agree with here.

I think they are seeking legal lawsuits like this to help prevent any future issues (like having arrest warrants issued for them in the UK, preventing them from ever being there, or the risk of other countries arresting them and shipping them to the UK to face the fines/charges).

[–] gian@lemmy.grys.it 1 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Whether I like the UK’s act, they are free to set the laws of their land. So if foreign websites don’t want to comply, the UK is also free to order its ISPs to block the site.

Yes, and 4chan is an asshole, if you want to do business in a country you need to respect the country's laws even if your company in not in that country.

What 4chan can do (and it is the only thing) is to block people from UK. Or find a way to convince a UK court that the law is unconstitutional (or the UK equivalent) but I would not bet on this.

[–] sunbeam60@lemmy.ml 2 points 3 days ago

Yes despite my downvotes I’ll stick my neck out to agree with you.

If a US company wanted to sell liquor online in the UK, they’d have to follow U.K. laws for alcohol licensing and age-verified delivery.

I don’t know why age verification is any different. That’s the UK law (which I disagree with for what it’s worth, certainly in its current implementation) and if you want to operate in the UK (and for a website that means be accessible to U.K. audiences) you follow U.K. laws while here.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›