this post was submitted on 03 Sep 2025
802 points (98.4% liked)

Science Memes

16638 readers
2064 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 91 points 6 days ago (3 children)

The way this is phrased makes it sound like there's a certain threshold where this starts happening. That's not right. Even a grain of dust wouldn't orbit the sun, they still orbit their common barycenter. A less misleading way of phrasing would be that Jupiter is massive enough that the barycenter of it and the sun actually lies outside the sun, which is still a cool fun fact.

[–] BillBurBaggins@lemmy.world 36 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I mean that's literally the point the image is trying to make. The last sentence says the point is outside the sun for Jupiter.

I don't think nitpicking the title achieves anything and it's not even misleading unless it's only taken in isolation.

[–] Droggelbecher@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It says it's so massive they orbit a common point. That directly implies this only happens over a certain mass.

[–] CannonFodder@lemmy.world 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It says it's so massive they orbit a common point outside the sun. Smaller planets don't have their common point outside the sun.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Orbiting a point within the sun is still orbiting the sun.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] technocrit@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 6 days ago

I was going to complain about the use of "barycenter" instead of the more commonly known "center of mass". But after some searching, I guess barycenter is more obscure because it's more specific. I'm ok with that.

[–] WraithGear@lemmy.world 46 points 6 days ago (4 children)

i mean, with that logic, nothing orbits anything

[–] pixeltree@lemmy.blahaj.zone 55 points 6 days ago

For most bodies the barycenter, while not the same as the center of mass, is still inside the sun. This one isn't, making it notable

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 28 points 6 days ago (3 children)

No, this is actually really relevant. This is part of the logic applied to labeling Pluto a dwarf planet. Pluto and it's moon do this, Earth and our moon do not. Yes, obviously the center of mass of the two isn't the exact center of the earth but it's still within the earth.

[–] captainlezbian@lemmy.world 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Asking a physicist about the center of an object is like asking a Tumblr user about thr color of the sky. The only response will be "which one?" And a sigh of exhaustion

Center of volume ≠ center of mass ≠ center of systemic gravity ≠ center of lift…

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Boddhisatva@lemmy.world 17 points 6 days ago

You're not wrong. Everything orbits the center of mass of the system, meaning the mass of the star and the body in orbit. And that is handy for astronomers, many exoplanets have been found using the Doppler spectroscopy method. Doppler spectroscopy measures the Doppler shift in the star's light as it is pulled towards and away from us by planets in orbit. The newest spectrographs are sensitive enough to detect a star's wobble caused by an Earth sized body in orbit. The barycenter is still within the star, but not at the center of the star's mass.

[–] fedditter@feddit.org 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Fun fact: You actually pull the Earth up with the same force it pulls you down.. Newton’s Third Law.

[–] vic_rattlehead@lemmy.world 15 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I've been told that certain peoples mothers happen to pull the earth with a bit more force than others.

[–] fedditter@feddit.org 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Thats a pretty thick attraction. Newtons 7. Street Law.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bennypr0fane@discuss.tchncs.de 13 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Do all the planets also orbit around that same barycenter, or does each planet have a different one?

[–] untorquer@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

All the solar system matter contributes to an object's orbital center but that's constantly moving as the system moves.

I think (?) most planets have their barycenter inside the sun's surface

The gravitational pull of system matter pales in comparison to the sun so you don't need to consider it for amateur purposes.

You can try KSP (Vanilla) versus Kopernicus mod if you want to feel the difference.

Also called n-body

[–] CompassRed@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Technically speaking, no celestial body in our solar system orbits around a single point. The barycenter thing only works with two bodies. When there are more than two bodies, such as in our solar system, the orbits become chaotic. Granted, the influence between planets is small, so they all appear to orbit their barycenters with the sun, but there are small perturbations to the orbits caused by the locations and masses of all the other bodies in the solar system.

[–] saimen@feddit.org 3 points 5 days ago

Isn't that the 3-body-problem? That already with 3 bodies affecting each other a system is chaotic.

[–] badcommandorfilename@lemmy.world 8 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

I guess they all orbit around the solar system's center of mass (negligibly affected by the universal CoM), but that CoM probably moves around as the planets themselves move.

Relative to what, you might ask? That depends who you're asking 😉

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] deltapi@lemmy.world 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The barycenter is different for each planet-sun (or any two object) pairing.

The earth and moon have a barycenter which is beneath the surface of earth. Likewise, the barycenter of the sun-earth pair is below the surface of the sun

Edit:

The barycenter of our solar system orbits the center of our galaxy (again in a barycentric manner)

[–] SCmSTR@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Jeeezzz...Gravity is relentless.

[–] some_kind_of_guy@lemmy.world 4 points 6 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ABetterTomorrow@sh.itjust.works 10 points 1 week ago

That’s why I lose my balance!

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 5 points 6 days ago (2 children)

This is true about any 2 objects with mass.

[–] jsomae@lemmy.ml 26 points 6 days ago (4 children)

No, it is not true in general that the barycenter lies outside both objects.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] kerrigan778@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)
[–] SippyCup@feddit.nl 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

It was outside the environment.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

A wave hit it.

[–] boonhet@sopuli.xyz 3 points 6 days ago

The front is not supposed to fall off

[–] ProgrammingSocks@pawb.social 1 points 5 days ago

Barycenters are not necessarily outside the objects, either.

load more comments
view more: next ›