this post was submitted on 23 Sep 2025
1745 points (98.7% liked)

Science Memes

17164 readers
2925 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] TacoButtPlug@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 month ago

I did too many drugs in high school. I don't remember a lot.

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

I didn't graduate highschool though

[–] missfrizzle@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I was taught that serious academics favored Support Vector Machines over Neural Networks, which industry only loved because they didn't have proper education. oops...

also, Computer Vision was considered "AI-complete" and likely decades away. ImageNet dropped a couple years I graduated. though I guess it ended up being "AI-complete" in a way...

[–] bluemellophone@lemmy.world 2 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (2 children)

Before AlexNet, SVMs were the best algorithms around. LeNet was the only comparable success case for NNs back then, and it was largely seen as exclusively limited to MNIST digits because deep networks were too hard to train. People used HOG+SVM, SIFT, SURF, ORB, older Haar / Viola-Jones features, template matching, random forests, Hough Transforms, sliding windows, deformable parts models… so many techniques that were made obsolete once the first deep networks became viable.

The problem is your schooling was correct at the time, but the march of research progress eventually saw 1) the creation of large, million-scale supervised datasets (ImageNet) and 2) larger / faster GPUs with more on-card memory.

It was fact back in ~2010 that SVMs were superior to NNs in nearly every aspect.

Source: started a PhD on computer vision in 2012

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] degoogler@lemmy.zip 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

In an atom, the electrons orbit around the nucleus in the same manner as the planets orbit around the sun.

That's been debunked for many many decades but middle scool still teaches this model. At least I wasn't told back then how misleading and wrong that is, only in high school right before graduating the physics teacher emphasized this misconception. I remember how mad she was about it lol. I have no clue how its taught elsewhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›