this post was submitted on 05 Oct 2025
193 points (98.0% liked)

Ask Lemmy

35014 readers
1421 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

I have donated in the past, but then there were wild accusations, people saying it's not needed, it's to fund other things, and so on and so forth.

Yesterday I got the popup begging for a couple of euros, so what's the status? Should I donate or is it a waste of time and money?

Cheers

Edit: Thanks for all the insightful posts! I'm jobless at the moment so just ten bucks this time:

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jxk@sh.itjust.works 174 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Remember that there is a lot of anti-Wikipedia propaganda going around these days. Most "outrage" against Wikipedia is created and pushed artificially.

[–] ComradeMiao@lemmy.world 19 points 6 days ago (1 children)

It’s just that one dude here

[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 14 points 6 days ago

Ia it the.dude that's downvoting everything here?

[–] Blubber28@lemmy.world 90 points 6 days ago

In the current day and age of misinformation I think donating is more important than ever. It doesn't need to be much.

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 83 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Reddit users and now lemmy users seem to have a riotous distaste for non-profits generally.

Wikipedia is one of the last, good parts of the internet, and it's under increasing threat.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] primrosepathspeedrun@anarchist.nexus 80 points 6 days ago (3 children)

Wikipedia is being actively attacked by fascists who dont want it to exist or be well maintained. More important than ever. Criticism can be safely ignored.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] DeadPixel@lemmy.zip 72 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I’ve increased the amount I donate since the campaign to discredit them has been in effect.

Maybe they aren’t perfect, but I don’t like the idea of a world without such a wonderful resource being freely available to everyone no matter their background or financial status.

I used it a lot as a student but couldn’t afford to donate then. I don’t use it directly a lot these days, but I’m sure indirectly it contributes to articles I read, & I can afford to donate now, so I try to pay it back & some.

Information is power, & those in/with power seem to currently be trying their best to bring everyone else down. Any small thing I can do to help prevent that is a win in my book.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sunshine@lemmy.ca 73 points 6 days ago

If Elon doesn’t like it then you know Wikipedia is good.

[–] Humanius@lemmy.world 63 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (1 children)

Wikipedia, being a free source of information, is an incredibly important resource and a net good for humanity. But since Wikipedia is free for all they rely on donations to keep the lights on.

There are groups who would prefer it if that free access to information did not exist, or could be more easily be controlled and/or manipulated. It is in their interest to convince people not to donate to Wikipedia

I'm convinced that this "don't donate to Wikipedia" messaging that has cropped up in recent years is a psyop, set up by these groups with the goal to starve Wikipedia of income.

Don't fall for it. Support one of the last truly good places on the internet.

[–] abbadon420@sh.itjust.works 35 points 6 days ago

I never donated. Until the fascists told me not to donate. Now I donate regularly.

[–] gi1242@lemmy.world 51 points 6 days ago

DONATE!

Wikipedia made a conscious choice to remain free, ad free and neutral.

They get my money! Even if they don't need it.

[–] RacerX@lemmy.zip 28 points 5 days ago

I give small monthly donations to three things:

  • Wikipedia
  • EFF
  • Internet Archive
[–] Kovukono@pawb.social 38 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 10 points 5 days ago

Your analysis only addresses the income vs. expenditure being relatively balanced. It doesn’t address the criticisms OP was hearing about. The primary criticism is that the foundation only needs a fraction of their current expenditure if all they did was run Wikipedia.

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 17 points 5 days ago (6 children)

Usually its the far right or tankies that hate wikipedia, it seems pretty neutral for the most part.

[–] Tollana1234567@lemmy.today 13 points 5 days ago

they hate it, because it has all the info of everything bad that a republican/conservative, far right government did, and its very hard to deflect/ or deny the amount of evidence from it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 6 points 4 days ago (1 children)

I don't know if they "needed" donations in the past, but the America right wing fascists have just taken aim at it. So they are going to need money to defend themselves.

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

If the fachos and the tankies hate it, it's a good sign 😁

[–] MHLoppy@fedia.io 38 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I simultaneously believe that Wikipedia is valuable and that it's not clear that WMF needed $185 million dollars.

As far as I can tell the situation has not significantly changed since "the last time(s)" this was discussed. Wikipedia remains a valuable resource, and WMF continues to aggressively increase both spending and fundraising revenue. Whether you think that means you should donate or not is probably the same answer as it was several years ago for most individuals based on personal preferences.

edit: typo

[–] Aatube@kbin.melroy.org 14 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I think the answer has changed a bit since they got a much better CEO who’s doing a lot more communication and engagement with the community, which dictates what Wikipedia looks like

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] last_philosopher@lemmy.world 25 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I give through my employer which matches donations. You should look into whether that's available since it'll double the amount.

Decentralized truth is essential to human freedom. It's not enough to just run wikipedia as a bare bones site, they need to be able to adapt to the times and maybe even fund new projects with the same goals. For people who actually care about the future, it's hard to think of a better use of the money.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] passepartout@feddit.org 32 points 6 days ago (3 children)
[–] ripcord@lemmy.world 12 points 6 days ago

Also donate to Kiwix

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] cokeslutgarbage@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I do not have the means to donate to things that I care about. Most weeks, the difference between overdrafting my bank account or not is literally a few cents. I donate the $3.10 every time the pop up shows up on Wikipedia. I'm sure there are other organizations that need the money more, but I think Wikipedia is SO important, and so far has remained earnest in their behavior. Proud of you for donating what you could, glad I could help a little bit too.

Be well, friend

[–] Valmond@lemmy.world 7 points 5 days ago

Hey, I remember a time when if I lost a 5€ bill, that meant I'd eat for 5 euros less that month.

We've got your back, take care of yourself and consider donating when you've come around and can do it without second thoughts.

Cheers and hang in there, it's worth it!

[–] 9point6@lemmy.world 26 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Always fund Wikipedia if you have the ability to

It may not need a donation at any given time, but given how volatile things are in the USA right now, there's every chance they might find themselves needing to suddenly spend a lot on lawyers

It's arguably one of the most important resources we have as humanity. It's imperative we protect it.

[–] RBWells@lemmy.world 21 points 6 days ago

I give them a little every year, and do not consider it a waste at all. I give $ each month to the community radio station with local news on it too.

Those free nonprofit media companies are important. They are the voice of the people.

[–] AmidFuror@fedia.io 22 points 6 days ago (3 children)

It's good to see Fediverse people actually supporting paying for something. Sometimes I think they want everything for free.

[–] BrainBow65@lemmy.world 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I don't think people here mind paying for stuff I think it's more that enshittification and subscription based business models should not be supported.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] compostgoblin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 5 days ago

I find it valuable and worth supporting, so I donate a dollar a month. It’s not much, but I want to contribute (monetarily, in addition to editing)

[–] MrsDoyle@sh.itjust.works 12 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I'm another monthly donor. I use Wikipedia nearly every day and appreciate the effort that goes into maintaining it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 13 points 5 days ago

Making a monthly contribution. Who knows where the money goes but I've never heard of a wiki project I disapproved of and there is a lot to like about what they do.

[–] eatyourglory@piefed.social 21 points 6 days ago (1 children)

If the only non-profit you care about is the Wikimedia Foundation, then yeah donate.
But otherwise, go donate to other non-profits as Wikimedia is the least needy of the foundations (they are one of the most "well off" of the non-profits in the world afterall

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] peoplebeproblems@midwest.social 18 points 6 days ago

Do you use it?

Donate. I donate $5/mo. Gonna bump it up to $10/month soon.

[–] OsrsNeedsF2P@lemmy.ml 20 points 6 days ago (4 children)

I love Wikipedia and have donated a lot of time and money, but damn is their foundation wasteful

[–] null_dot@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 6 days ago

Every organisation appears wasteful. Whether it's a non-profit, local club, or government organisation.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] unexposedhazard@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) (3 children)

Lets say they are being very stupid in how they handle their money. They spend as much as they get every year. If they get more money, they spend more money. From the graph you can see that donation growth is slowing down, because of course it does, it cant just grow forever. The questions is whether they can lower their expenses when the donations inevitably shrink, or if they will sacrifice Wikipedia (the thing that people actually donate for) in favor of all the other things they are spending money on.

A completely different perspective on this is that you should ask yourself whether the Wikimedia Foundation really is the organization/charity that needs your money the most. Or more bluntly, i am 100% certain that there are better things to donate to than the Wikimedia Foundation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Fundraising_statistics
Black: Net assets / Green: Revenue (Donations) / Red: Expenses

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Havatra@lemmy.zip 16 points 6 days ago

I'm also curious about this. If there are any transparency reports, I'd love to read through that.

The Wikimedia Foundation are trying to implement some AI solutions (for helping humans, not write articles/information), which is likely quite costly, unless someone donates it. However, I imagine many others' scrapers for AI are constantly demanding a lot from the Wikipedia servers since some years ago, probably resulting in increased costs. Hopefully the AI builders use a local copy of the torrent instead, but I fear they don't...

I'm still happily donating though, as I think the Wikipedia Foundation are still doing a solid job, despite me not always agreeing with their decisions.

[–] midtsveen@lemmy.wtf 10 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I donate $5 each month! ❤

People who down vote real dislikes Wikipedia!

load more comments
view more: next ›