this post was submitted on 07 Oct 2025
62 points (97.0% liked)

Asklemmy

50811 readers
743 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Like 5 or 10 years from now, scientists and researchers from across all universities will point out that "AI IS BAD!".

all 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CrabAndBroom@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

That COVID essentially gave everyone PTSD or brain damage or both, and has probably fucked us for at least a generation, maybe more.

NB: As a side note, this is just a hunch but I suspect that the next generation coming up (IE people who were infants/very young kids at the time COVID started) is going to be a real weird one. They missed out on crucial social development milestones because of the lockdowns, probably most of them got COVID because we rushed everyone back to school and who knows what that does to very young brains, and they'll spend the rest of their formative years in this sort of jibbering fascist aftermath that we seem to be currently living in. I have no idea what effect this will have on society, but I'll go out on a limb and say "probably not good."

[–] bryophile@lemmy.zip 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

That there is no solution to climate change under capitalism

[–] deathbird@mander.xyz 7 points 1 day ago

That AI use stunts mental capacity and learning. That handing kids iPads doesn't make them good at computers. Other stuff too probably, but I'll wait for more studies to come out. Your question is basically "Which of your hot takes do you think will be vindicated in the next decade?"

[–] Inucune@lemmy.world 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Vaping is bad for you.

Current energy drinks cause heart/cardiovascular problems.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm honestly shocked that energy drinks are as unregulated as they are. Like, they don't have warnings on the cans or anything. Way back when I was in high school, a friend on the golf team would drink 3 or 4 red bulls during a round of golf. By sophomore year of college, he had to quit the team (that he had a full ride scholarship to play on) because of heart problems caused by the energy drinks.

[–] Fyrnyx@kbin.melroy.org 2 points 1 day ago

They do have warning labels on most of them. Sorry to say but some people bring these problems onto themselves. Like, I know what I'm doing by drinking Monster Java drinks almost every day. I limit 2 a day because that's the 'safe limit'. Any more, I'd be asking for it. I can't imagine what it'd be like drinking 4 of them in one day though.

It's like they're to be treated like alcohol - drink responsibly. These aren't the kind of drinks you'd chug down like you would a bottle of water or something.

[–] spittingimage@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's already known that vaping is bad for you. When using one, you're inhaling heavy metal vapours from the heating element.

[–] emeralddawn45@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This study was funded by tobacco companies, only involved cheap disposable vapes that were made in china, and didn't find heavy metals in all samples. It didn't include any of the long term use vapes or coils that you fill with your own juice. No study thats been done on those have ever found any negative health effects.

[–] Crozekiel@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

Like, it's obviously not better for you than just breathing air. But it is also by all evidence better than smoking. But there has been a massive PR push to making vaping the absolute devil and just not mentioning smoking at all. It is anecdotal at best, but I can say that giving up cigarettes for a vape has made my breathing feel significantly better day-to-day. I have people actively smoking cigarettes tell me I need to quit vaping because "it's so bad for you".

Do I think that people that have never smoked should start vaping - absolutely not. Do I think people smoking 3 packs of cigarettes a day would be generally healthier if they switched to vaping - absolutely yes.

[–] JackbyDev@programming.dev 12 points 2 days ago

Well, if you asked me a couple months ago I'd say a study that says genocide is happening is Gaza but the UN finally did it. https://www.ohchr.org/en/press-releases/2025/09/israel-has-committed-genocide-gaza-strip-un-commission-finds

[–] NKBTN@feddit.uk 13 points 2 days ago

That societies were wrong to promote non-violent protest as the only permitted form of resistance.

That Trump wasn’t very good for the economy.

[–] wewbull@feddit.uk 21 points 2 days ago

That this thread is full of results from existing studies.

[–] belluck@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Notice how almost every study in this thread has already been done numerous times.

The Cons just say they’re wrong and the media claims that they have to represent ”both sidesβ€œ so the general public gets lead to believe the studies are also just opinions.

[–] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 33 points 2 days ago

Trans people are who they say they are.

We know this shit. I’m so tired of arguing against bad-faith motherfuckers for my existence.

[–] ultranaut@lemmy.world 22 points 2 days ago

All that plastic inundating the environment and accumulating in our bodies is actually a serious problem.

[–] scytale@piefed.zip 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I’m no food scientist or dietitian, but I won’t be surprised if Keto and Carnivore diets are confirmed to accelerate high blood pressure and heart disease.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 9 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

You would be very surprised! The effects of low-carbohydrate diets on cardiovascular risk factors: A meta-analysis

TLDR Metabolic health is mostly impacted by poor diet, excess glucose and carbohydrates (which directly become glucose). Reducing elevated glucose levels has direct and measurable improvements on blood pressure and CVD risk.

A strict ketogenic intervention is so potent that people taking blood pressure medication have to be very careful and monitor their blood pressure when starting to reduce their medicine so they don't faint from hypotension.... i.e. Cardiovascular disease risk factor responses to a type 2 diabetes care model including nutritional ketosis induced by sustained carbohydrate restriction at 1 year: an open label, non-randomized, controlled study

[–] Hexarei@beehaw.org 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Everything I've seen about keto is that it helps with reducing blood pressure. I've not gone full keto but I've cut out carbs significantly (alongside intermittent fasting, only eating 11a-7p) and it curbed my blood pressure issues over about a year.

Carnivore I wouldn't be surprised about though.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com -1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Carnivore I wouldn't be surprised about though.

Carnivore is just keto.

[–] dizzy@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

No it’s not. Keto allows you to eat low carb plants whereas the carnivore diet eliminates all non-animal products.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 days ago

Yes, but its a ketogenic eating pattern. Zero carb.

Carnivore is a type of keto, and gets all of the benefits we see with keto

[–] Tenderizer78@lemmy.ml 8 points 2 days ago

That children shouldn't drink 2 cups of milk every day.

[–] SnokenKeekaGuard@lemmy.dbzer0.com 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Rosemary oils effect in helping prevent baldness will be shown to be much less useful than initially thought.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I have never heard of this one but my understanding is anything that blocks the effect of testosterone should prevent male baldness. Most plant oils commonly used are testosterone blocking or estrogenic. I can see how a connection might have been made

[–] cannon_annon88@lemmy.today 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've been trying it on my ever-receding hairline and my hair is only growing slower and slower up top 😒

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Have you tried caffeine conditioner?

Nope, never heard of it before. Does it work?

[–] Mycatiskai@lemmy.ca 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Vaccines don't cause autism.

Homeopathy doesnt work.

You'll never actually get studies "proving" this in a scientific sense, unfortunately, because there's really no way to design an ethical experiment. You can't force one group to take homeopathic treatments vs another group receiving medical care, just as you can't force one group to take vaccines while another doesn't.

That being said, there are longitudinal studies demonstrating the rates of autism amongst vaccinated individuals and I wouldn't be surprised if someone had done a similar study regarding medical outcomes for people who take homeopathic treatments. It's just that scientists will never call that "proof" because the bar is very high, and media will always conflate that with "the jury is still out who knows what's right" because they're profit hungry bastards.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

I think in both cases that was already pretty well proven to be the case wasn't it?

[–] chuckleslord@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

That going out and collecting random data is an inefficient and ineffective model of science. P hunting just makes worse scientists.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

AI is not inherently bad. That’s like saying computers are bad. It’s the implementations of AI and the unethical training of AI that’s bad.

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 0 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

I doubt we'll ever have a study which determines if a thing is ethical or not. We'd first need an objective definition of ethics.

[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

AI can do it for you 😏

[–] CXORA@aussie.zone 0 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago) (1 children)
[–] venusaur@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago
[–] pastel_de_airfryer@lemmy.eco.br 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] Supervisor194@lemmy.world 3 points 2 days ago

I want to believe.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 2 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would love to see a well funded interventional study on institutionalized populations comparing a totally pbf diet vs totally abf diets and settle the debate once and for all.

[–] VinesNFluff@pawb.social 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

What do those acronyms mean

Google didn't help

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 2 days ago

PBF : Plant based food - The all plant based diet that gets lots of press

ABF : Animal based foods - the zero carbohydrate ketogenic that usually has lots of controversy