this post was submitted on 17 Oct 2025
378 points (98.7% liked)

Technology

76223 readers
3167 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Darjuz@feddit.it 14 points 1 day ago

I didn't expect in my life to side with 4chan

[–] HexesofVexes@lemmy.world 29 points 1 day ago

4chan is an extreme example of an unmoderated site - indeed it's what the OSA was designed to combat. If this legislative test fails, it would undermine the acts legitimacy, and provoke questions as to it's existence.

It's a shit law - it's not fit for purpose. Its sole reason for existence is to controle public speech, not protect the children.

[–] MrSulu@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

As shitty as 4chan is, as dumb and pointless as that UK legislation is, we STILL invited Trump to dine with the King. The Royal family didn't even invite thier own pedo.

[–] chunes@lemmy.world 17 points 1 day ago (1 children)

UK is ultra lame for this.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] iAvicenna@lemmy.world 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would normally be sympathetic to their stand except earlier this year when this first started, they called on Trump to use all available political leverages to prevent this and protect free speech. Calling on Trump to protect free speech is just absolutely ridiculous.

[–] Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 day ago

We're allowed to call it retarded now at least

/s

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] webp@mander.xyz 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

At least they are a little less fucked now lmao

[–] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com 15 points 1 day ago (1 children)

4chan is full of assholes, but blocking websites is pretty fucked. what person wants their government doing that?

[–] WALLACE@feddit.uk 10 points 1 day ago

None of us do. Most of us have started using VPNs ever since this law came into effect.

[–] ArmchairAce1944@discuss.online 24 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I never thought I'd be siding with 4chan.

Just to let you know I was never a 4chan user.

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That catchca is fucking ass. Who the hell wants to do that every post?

[–] burntbacon@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 1 day ago

Back in the day it was humorous, because every 4chan poster 'knew' to replace the word that was obviously the unknown word with a slur, curse, pejorative, or random word. Like, how did 4chan not get ripped from being able to use capcha?

[–] madjo@feddit.nl 13 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's exactly what a 4chan user would say... *narrows eyes in suspicion*

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 45 points 2 days ago

Welp, i agree with 4chan.

[–] Deathray5@lemmynsfw.com 120 points 3 days ago

I hate agreeing with fucking 4chan but fair

[–] DeathByBigSad@sh.itjust.works 37 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Inb4 major Lemmy instances get banned

[–] roserose56@lemmy.zip 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Let's start with who they going to fine, and which domains will they Ban!
But yea, it could happen.

[–] pastermil@sh.itjust.works 68 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Having Fedi folks agreeing with 4chan is not on my bingo card this year, or ever.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] spez@sh.itjust.works 57 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I might not like what you have to say, but I'll defend to death, your right to say it kinda shit

[–] WALLACE@feddit.uk 2 points 1 day ago

The permission of unrestricted hate speech is what leads the people like your current president being your current president.

[–] AwesomeLowlander@sh.itjust.works 22 points 2 days ago (13 children)

Within reason. Libel, incitement to violence, hate speech, etc, should be illegal for obvious reasons

[–] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Maybe, but what about when governments start saying being anti-israel is hate speech?

Once your govt has been captured by foreign interests, it doesn't really matter what laws are on the books anyway, they'll find a way to screw you over.

[–] hayvan@feddit.nl 5 points 2 days ago

Early this year Rümeysa Öztürk was kidnapped and deported from USA with precisely that excuse. Anti-Israel hence pro Hamas hence enemy of USA.

[–] nekbardrun@lemmy.world 16 points 2 days ago (4 children)

There is an obvious reason why countries like Germany make a strong stance against any "trolling" nazi joke/imagery/salute.

But America's First Amendment seems to not understand that reason (or only understand when it is weaponized against communism, black people, trans rights and all the "woke culture" stuff)

[–] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

But America’s First Amendment seems to not understand that reason (or only understand when it is weaponized against communism, black people, trans rights and all the “woke culture” stuff)

Like alot of things in the USA, laws are selectively enforced to protect the status quo.

"Youre anti fascist? Youre a terrorist!"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
[–] maxxadrenaline@lemmy.world 65 points 3 days ago (11 children)

Well the internet is written mostly by bots. Everything needs Id and spying. We may end up building a new internet so fuck the old internet

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod@lemmy.world 70 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We’ll build a new internet with blackjack and hookers.

Just like it used to be.

[–] ryannathans@aussie.zone 27 points 3 days ago (2 children)

You know what, forget the blackjack

[–] Agent641@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

And the hookers are just all obese sweaty neckbears roleplaying as hookers

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] fistac0rpse@fedia.io 53 points 3 days ago (8 children)

It's ridiculous for the UK to issue fines to a company who doesn't operate in the country. Just block access if that's whatever your stupid laws dictate.

[–] veniasilente@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 2 days ago

What? And let loose what is basically an opportunity for a bribe?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] F_State@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

Well fuck the UK but lolz at 4chan. Once, long ago, they were a place to watch faces of death type stuff. And it went downhill from there.

[–] Soulg@ani.social 6 points 2 days ago
load more comments
view more: next ›