this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2025
216 points (86.7% liked)

politics

26216 readers
2602 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Feel this is a good accompanying piece for all the folk insisting on caping for a Blackwater merc wth a nazi tattoo because he said something they liked.

(page 4) 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] CovfefeKills@lemmy.world 0 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Gonna be really interesting to see how this guy turns out. A nazi that Lemmys love?

[–] the_q@lemmy.zip 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I honestly can't tell smear campaigns from fact from opinion from truth... anymore. I'm just tried. Y'all win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ProfThadBach@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago (6 children)

The outrage over Platner’s Totenkopf tattoo is the same tired playbook the DNC used against Bernie and Mamdani. When someone refuses to toe the corporate line, they reach for the smear file. This time they are pretending a centuries-old military emblem is proof of fascist sympathies. It is lazy, ahistorical, and typical of a leadership class that thrives on cultural panic instead of context.

The Totenkopf, or “death’s head,” has a long military lineage that predates the Nazis by more than a hundred years. Prussian cavalry first used it in the 18th century, and the Brunswick Hussars under Duke Ferdinand of Brunswick wore it during the Seven Years’ War as a symbol of fearlessness and a reminder of mortality. It was never political. It was about the reality that soldiers live with death close by and fight in spite of it.

By the Napoleonic era, both Prussian and Brunswick forces kept the tradition alive. The Brunswick “Black Brunswickers” who fought against Napoleon wore black uniforms with silver skulls on their shakos. For them the skull meant defiance and the willingness to die for their homeland, not devotion to ideology.

In World War I, the Totenkopf appeared again among elite German units such as the 17th and 92nd Hussars. It stood for camaraderie, courage, and readiness to face death. The Nazis later stole and corrupted it for the SS and concentration camp guards, but that does not erase its earlier meaning.

The skull also appeared in the British Army. The 17th Lancers adopted the skull-and-crossbones in 1759 after the Battle of Warburg, pairing it with the motto “Death or Glory.” It became famous during the Charge of the Light Brigade in 1854. For them, the image carried the same memento mori message that European soldiers had shared for centuries: remember death, and live with courage.

To those of us who study and reenact military history, the Totenkopf is not inherently fascist. It is part of a broader European tradition where the skull reminds soldiers that life is fragile and valor is not eternal. It is a symbol of mortality and defiance, not hate. History deserves context before condemnation.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 5 days ago (4 children)

If he actually thinks Nazism is repulsive he can live stream the removal.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] FauxLiving@lemmy.world -3 points 5 days ago

Oh, I love this game:

Nazis were incredibly interested in tattoos.

OP is incredibly interested in tattoos.

Therefore OP is a Nazi.


Reality is irrelevant if you're just willing to engage in ad hominem, fallacies and motivated reasoning.

[–] Lutra@lemmy.world -1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago) (3 children)

That this story needs deep investigation is illogical. The man has had a Nazi tattoo for 20 years, and said he never knew. There are 2 reasonable possibilities:

Either he is extremely dull -- a disqualification from office

or

He is a liar


also a disqualification from office.

To dive into the story, is an effort to support what? a person who's behavior has disqualified him. Or else, he is undisqualifiable, and that's a interesting point.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›