this post was submitted on 26 Jun 2023
52 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

39534 readers
415 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Tech CEOs want us to believe that generative AI will benefit humanity. They are kidding themselves

(page 2) 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] esc27@kbin.social 2 points 2 years ago

Merits of the tech aside, It is amazing to see how many people are becoming ludites in response to this technology, especially those in industries who thought they were safe from automation. I feel like there has always been a sense of hubris between the creative industries and general labor, and AI is now forcing us to look in a computer generated mirror and reassess how special we really are.

[–] kiku123@feddit.de 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Thanks for sharing this article. I agree that those points mentioned are not possible for GenAI. It is a pipe dream that GenAI is capable of global governance, because it can't really understand the implications of what it means. It's a Clever Hans and just outputs what it thinks that you want to see.

I think that with GenAI there are some job classes that are in danger (tech support continues to shrink for common cases, etc.), but mostly the entry-level positions. Ultimately, someone who actually knows what's going on would need to intervene.

Similarly for things like writing or programming, GenAI can produce okay work, but it needs to be prompted by someone who can understand the bigger picture and check it's work. Writing becomes more editing in this case, and programming becomes more code review.

[–] Dadifer@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I truly believe that multiple medical specialties will be taken over by AI.

[–] goldenbug@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Assisted diagnosis? Yes... The rest? Not for many years.

[–] FaceDeer@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

There have been studies that show patients already prefer the bedside manner of ChatGPT over human physicians, so that's another thing we'll likely see soon.

[–] Evoke3626@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 2 years ago

What an awesome article, couldn’t agree me

[–] exohuman@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

Some great conversation here. Thanks everyone who responded so far!

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›