this post was submitted on 13 Nov 2023
26 points (79.5% liked)

Apple

18796 readers
29 users here now

Welcome

to the largest Apple community on Lemmy. This is the place where we talk about everything Apple, from iOS to the exciting upcoming Apple Vision Pro. Feel free to join the discussion!

Rules:
  1. No NSFW Content
  2. No Hate Speech or Personal Attacks
  3. No Ads / Spamming
    Self promotion is only allowed in the pinned monthly thread

Lemmy Code of Conduct

Communities of Interest:

Apple Hardware
Apple TV
Apple Watch
iPad
iPhone
Mac
Vintage Apple

Apple Software
iOS
iPadOS
macOS
tvOS
watchOS
Shortcuts
Xcode

Community banner courtesy of u/Antsomnia.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

TL;DR: Apple's upcoming iOS 18, macOS 15, watchOS 11, and tvOS 18 updates are expected to be "ambitious and compelling," featuring generative AI improvements, especially in Siri. The revamped Siri may offer enhanced integration with Messages, auto-generated Apple Music playlists, and productivity app integration. Apple is investing $1 billion annually in AI research, aiming to compete with Google and OpenAI. The company is debating whether to deploy the new AI technology via the cloud, on-device, or a combination. (via ChatGPT)

top 32 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] aberrate_junior_beatnik@lemmy.world 34 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Lauded as 'Ambitious and Compelling' by Apple Execs

Well, if they say so it must be true

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 15 points 2 years ago

Translating that from Apple speak, that means it'll be kind of impressive, but be missing clearly basic features and customizations.

[–] Tempo@lemmy.world 32 points 2 years ago

"This thing is ambitious and compelling" says people selling you the thing.

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 18 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I’ve yet to find a product general AI helped.

I don’t want an AI to make Music playlists. I want simple rules that make sense. Pandora figured that out 23 years ago.

[–] deleted@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Ai upscaling is a good example. Also chatgpt if you do lots of searches.

[–] AProfessional@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago

Upscaling is more successful. Using it for search is a very mixed bag, leaning more on the bad side personally.

[–] nocturne213@lemm.ee 2 points 2 years ago (3 children)

The only use I have found for ChatGPT is to generate replies for spam texts.

[–] fer0n@lemm.ee 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Why would you want to reply to spam?

[–] nocturne213@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] money_loo@lemmy.world 5 points 2 years ago

It’s just bots adding you to more lists when you reply….

[–] Viper_NZ@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 years ago

I’ve used it to create plenty of bodgy powershell scripts for home use. It’ll get it 90% right, leaving me to quickly parse and fix it up.

Saves quite a bit of time.

[–] RubberBandMan@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

As a C programmer, asking ChatGPT python questions has been super helpful. I can reference some random python library from the corner of the internet and it’ll answer back like it’s an expert in the field. It’s not perfect, but I’m not going to waste my time writing python algorithms if ChatGPT can do it in 2 seconds.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I think AI has some potential uses, but it feels like Apple has ignored its Music app for years, they just have the bare minimum and stopped giving a shit. Adding AI is probably the last thing they needed to do to improve their music software.

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It does feel like it's ignored, mostly due to features being inconsistently integrated like for example Smart Playlists, but would you really call it the bare minimum? IMO both mobile and especially desktop app is a lot better than e.g. Spotify in terms of what it can do. Of course it probably wouldn't compare well against other current full music library managers though, I wouldn't exactly call Spotify fully-featured either, but against other streaming services I'd say it definitely holds up.

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 2 points 2 years ago

I think Apple needs to let Music go from the release cycle of the operating systems, especially if they're doubling down on Android and Windows support.

[–] paddirn@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I mostly interact with it through iTunes on Windows, which is sort of just sort of frozen in time and frustrating as hell to use (that's a whole other issue in and of itself), but even switching over to a Mac and trying to interact with my iPod just feels like a more irritating experience than it should be. Hell, most of the stuff I that I should be able to do on the iPod itself, just can't be done apparently and requires you hook it up to a PC/Mac. Simple things like just adding a song file, renaming a song name, adding it to an album, or adding a picture. Yeah, it's easier on a computer, but there shouldn't be any reason you can't have the same functionality on an iPod or iPad at this point. I dread having to add songs to my iPod anymore, because half the time it will just refuse to add it and I'll spend an hour or two trying to troubleshoot it to figure out what the problem is.

[–] 2xsaiko@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 2 years ago

Good point, I've heard iTunes on Windows is awful. And yeah lack of library management except on desktops is something I find annoying too. Thankfully it's not too bad for me since I'm subscribed to Apple Music so it syncs between my computer and phone, and I only have a few albums that I uploaded myself, but I can imagine it being very awful if you have a big local library only and have to hook it up to sync. Here's hoping at least iPhone/iPad get library management features in the future, iPod is unlikely since that's discontinued :(

[–] Flaky@iusearchlinux.fyi 1 points 2 years ago

Apple Music has a proper Windows app now, if you're willing to install from the Microsoft Store.

[–] fer0n@lemm.ee 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Not sure if you meant general AI or something else, that’s probably going to be a huge step if we ever get there. But the LLMs we currently have are already quite impactful even with their limitations. I don’t think anyone can deny that - and we’re clearly just at the beginning of this.

[–] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] projectsquared@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

“Brave”

[–] 271apple@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I doubt they're going to go back to a white background

[–] fer0n@lemm.ee 1 points 2 years ago

Haha, yeah pretty unlikely

[–] Humanbiscuit@lemmy.ml 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

So they’ve made no progress in making Siri decent with years of massive resourcing available to them. In that time they’ve at least given us -

Usb-C across the product range.

Reduced consumer pricing outcomes through economies of scale advantages.

Agile solutions to fit modern consumer requirements with a major overhaul of base RAM and cloud storage.

Worry free computing with no keyboard issues.

High end headphones with no rust issues

Industry leading battery life on their watch range combined with style advantages the competition can only dream of.

iPads that now function as a true 2 in 1 device, using M series chips to their full potential. This alone has revolutionised the tech industry.

The ultimate all in one gaming and productivity machines, creating a major shift to Apple as the leading choice for both lifestyle and business.

Ethical nirvana. No compromise solutions for the entire supply and distribution chain, ensuring ..

..sorry, realised this list was going to keep going for so long you would all need to upgrade your devices before I completed it.

Thanks Apple.

[–] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (2 children)

Apple Watch batteries are certain not industry leading. The average battery life of an Apple Watch is 18 hours. 36 if you have it in low power mode the entire time. The Fitbit versa on the other hand will give you four days.

One of the biggest pills to swallow when switching from my Versa 2 to Apple Watch was the severe drop in battery life.

[–] Humanbiscuit@lemmy.ml 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My entire post was satirical.

[–] CosmoVerde@kbin.social 1 points 2 years ago

The Apple Watch comment was my ‘hey, wait a second!’ Moment.

[–] Nogami@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago

I charge my ultra occasionally, but it’s not really an issue. I put on a fast charger before I have a shower and it’s never been anything I ever worry about. It never runs out of battery.

[–] Nogami@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

And upgrade I will! Trading in or selling the old one takes the sting off of a new one and makes it quite affordable.

[–] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Who’s dick do I have to suck to get a nice AI bot to filter my news for me? Pleas sprinkle some AI pixie dust on the News app. Kthx

[–] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Install “Boring Report”

[–] capital@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago

I’ve seen that one suggested but it doesn’t seem to employ LLMs to filter news down to what I want to read. Though removing sensationalism is a nice feature, I don’t want my news feed to contain any sports, celebrity, listicles, etc.

I’d like to be able to tune that filtering using an LLM with optimal summarization, ideally.