this post was submitted on 07 Dec 2023
516 points (87.4% liked)

Asklemmy

49624 readers
429 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy ๐Ÿ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 15) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[โ€“] chiliedogg@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (9 children)

Fractional measurements are better than decimal measurements for anything where the level of precision is important.

Decimal measurements can only increase our decrease in precision by a factor of 10.

For example if your precision is accurate to 1/4 of a unit, you can represent that with fractions no problem.

What is that in decimal? "0.25" implies precision to the hundredth of a unit.

What if your measurement is half a unit, but it's precise to 1/64 of a unit? Just don't reduce the fractions. "32/64ths" is more precise than .5.

load more comments (9 replies)
[โ€“] EldVrangr@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

4e was peak D&D and anything before or after is a pale comparison.

load more comments (2 replies)
[โ€“] smackjack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 years ago (4 children)

George W Bush was right when he said that faith based charities should not be excluded from receiving federal grants just because they're faith based.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: โ€น prev next โ€บ