this post was submitted on 26 Dec 2023
676 points (93.8% liked)

World News

41300 readers
2842 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 90 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (18 children)

[Drops flyers with warning message saying "we will attack soon; flee, those who can!"]

[Attacks the refugee camps, oh and also hospitals]

100% assholes. 👌 Equal to or worse than the Russians, I swear to freaking God.

[–] prole@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I don't think I remember hearing about Russians bombing Ukrainian refugee camps (though I could have missed it).

Seems like Putin sees civilians as an inconvenience that get in the way of his goals. For Netanyahu, it seems as though killing the civilians is the goal. I would say that the latter is objectively worse (though they are both pieces of shit).

[–] VR20X6@sh.itjust.works 61 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Russia intentionally bombed a ton of civilian targets with zero military value. It's weird that you don't remember this. There's even a lengthy Wikipedia article specifically about it: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Attacks_on_civilians_in_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine

[–] Mirshe@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Yeah, I seem to remember a lot of cruise missiles hitting apartments and schools.

[–] VR20X6@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 year ago

That's exactly what came immediately to mind for me as well.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] andxz@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Russia is bombing no less indiscriminately than Israel, it's just a much larger theater of war, their aiming capabilities suck and their shit gets shot down a lot before ever reaching anything.

They do the exact same thing day in day out. Taking out a cluster of civilians is probably worth an extra ration of vodka or even worse, a promotion, at this point.

Two wars of terror, if you want. Irony is stone cold dead at this point.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] victorz@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (13 children)

Putin sees civilians as an inconvenience that get in the way of his goals. For Netanyahu, it seems as though killing the civilians is the goal

Yes exactly, that was basically my point, that Israel is actively attacking civilians almost exclusively (it feels like to me anyway).

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (11 replies)
load more comments (17 replies)
[–] Spacehooks@reddthat.com 57 points 1 year ago (33 children)

I see ads in TV that are pro Isreal now with Santa crying because of Hamas kidnapped people. I know it's what about ism but not really moral high ground here when IDF literally wipes whole familes.

[–] DreamlandLividity@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Its not what-about-ism.

Being accused of attacking civilians and saying the enemy is attacking civilians to divert attention is what-about-ism.

Crying that the enemy is attacking civilians while you are also attacking civilians is hypocrisy.

Calling out your own/allied government for attacking civilians and trying to hold them accountable even if the enemy attacks civilians as well is being a good person.

load more comments (31 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 48 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Man, fuck Israel. I hope they all end up at the fucking international court at the Hague and go to jail for crimes against humanity and that the world finally tells Israel to back the fuck off and go back to the borders that were drawn in the 1967 UN Security Council resolution.

[–] Altofaltception@lemmy.world 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I can tell you without a doubt that as long as the US backs Israel this will not happen.

[–] yo_scottie_oh@lemmy.ml 14 points 1 year ago

Yup. Two words: Vee, and toe.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] cyborganism@lemmy.ca 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Aw man. My original comment was removed for incivility. Apologies to the mods. Thanks for not banning me on the spot. That's appreciated.

Gotta say it's difficult to remain civil in the face of a genocide.

What my original comment said, without the incivility, was:

I hope Israel and it's military end up at the international court at the Hague and go to jail for crimes against humanity and that the world finally tells Israel to back off and go back to the borders that were drawn in the 1967 UN Security Council resolution.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Clbull@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (8 children)

At what point does this go from being a counter terrorist operation to a genocide?

[–] runner_g@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago

A long time ago.

[–] SasquatchBanana@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago

🔫 Always has been

[–] Kalysta@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

It’s been a genocide since the Nakba. The US just refuses to call it that because we’re funding the damn thing.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] thecookingsenpai@lemmy.ml 15 points 1 year ago (7 children)

A lot of comments are saying that hamas hides behind civilians but from what I see and read hamas and civilians are a melting pot that is interwined due to the extreme oppression in gaza strip. Any palestinian civilian could understand and help or even just not condemn totally hamas due to their conditions and prolly Israel gladly label as hamas any slightly suspect palestinian top

[–] RGB3x3@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

If you know that your enemy is hiding behind civilians and still kill the civilians, you're the bad guy.

It's a piss poor excuse for murder.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Though You're mostly right, it's missing a key part: the Israeli government has actively worked to make it this way, sponsoring Hamas with money and help because they wanted this. If you have an extremist organization so intertwined in the civil population, you can just go and murder them all.

Hamas is evil, but the Israeli government is arguably worse

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] CosmicCleric@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

An army should go around civilians to get to their enemy, not through them.

[–] MarcoPOLO@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

yes but then that won't achieve Israeli goals

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Well I guess we found the 4th Reich.

[–] catbaba@lemmus.org 4 points 1 year ago

That's pretty fucked up

[–] Resol@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only world record you do not want to achieve without looking like a complete monster. And yet Israel managed to do just that.

[–] sailingbythelee@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

That is not even close to the world record. Killing 250 people in a day isn't good, obviously, but it is not even a rounding error compared to real warfare.

Just considering conventional weapons, the firebombing of Tokyo on the night of 9–10 March, 1945 killed approximately 100,000 people.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›