Technology

63236 readers

3757 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.

Our Rules

Follow the lemmy.world rules.
Only tech related content.
Be excellent to each other!
Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
Politics threads may be removed.
No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

L3s@lemmy.world

enu@lemmy.world

technopagan@lemmy.world

L4s@lemmy.world

350

Hot take: LLM technology is being purposefully framed as AI to avoid accountability (lemmy.world)

submitted 2 years ago by assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world to c/technology@lemmy.world

82 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Which of the following sounds more reasonable?

I shouldn't have to pay for the content that I use to tune my LLM model and algorithm.
We shouldn't have to pay for the content we use to train and teach an AI.

By calling it AI, the corporations are able to advocate for a position that's blatantly pro corporate and anti writer/artist, and trick people into supporting it under the guise of a technological development.

(page 2) 19 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] Greenskye@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

We shouldn’t have to pay for the content we use to train and teach an AI

Wait people think that sounds reasonable?

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] lolpostslol@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago

It’s just a happy coincidence for them, they call it AI because calling it “a search engine that steals stuff instead of linking to it and blends different sources together to look smarter” wouldn’t be as interesting to clueless financial markets people

load more comments