Linux

54333 readers

298 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 6 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

205

Anyone else starting to favor Flatpak over native packages? (lemmy.one)

submitted 2 years ago by DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one to c/linux@lemmy.ml

259 comments fedilink hide all child comments

I am currently using Linux Mint (after a long stint of using MX Linux) after learning it handles Nvidia graphics cards flawlessly, which I am grateful for. Whatever grief I have given Ubuntu in the past, I take it back because when they make something work, it is solid.

Anyways, like most distros these days, Flatpaks show up alongside native packages in the package manager / app store. I used to have a bias towards getting the natively packed version, but these days, I am choosing Flatpaks, precisely because I know they will be the latest version.

This includes Blender, Cura, Prusaslicer, and just now QBittorrent. I know this is probably dumb, but I choose the version based on which has the nicer icon.

(page 5) 49 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] aadil@merv.news 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

My experience with Flatpaks has been so stable and hassle-free that it motivated me to switch to Fedora Silverblue.

[–] DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

Hell yes! Feeling futuristic.

[–] fugepe@lemmy.world 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

almost all my apps are flatpaks

[–] DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Nice! May I ask what is your base system?

[–] fugepe@lemmy.world 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Opensuse TW.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Anticorp@lemmy.ml 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I like them for convenience, I don't like them for customability, possibly just because I don't know enough about them.

[–] DidacticDumbass@lemmy.one 1 points 2 years ago

That is a good point I have not encountered too often. I don't tend to customize the programs I use. I tend to just learn the defaults for that program.

Anyways, people keep recommending FlatSeal, which is a graphical way to customize Flatpak permissions, so that may be helpful to you.

[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 0 points 2 years ago (1 children)

When I first used it it felt like they were usually out of date or missing. But nowadays It seems like I can find like 90% of the apps I use as flatpaks, leaving packages mainly for backend and terminal stuff.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] GustavoM@lemmy.world -1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Unless they come up with something else that is not "Windowsfying" Linux with one-click installs... then nah, no thanks.

load more comments (3 replies)

load more comments