this post was submitted on 27 Feb 2024
1436 points (98.7% liked)

Reddit

14063 readers
36 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 44 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] modifier@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I appreciate this sentiment, but I would not advise paying moderators straight out.

[–] PunnyName@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, need to tax the shit out of them and make the profits a social benefit. Fuck the rich. Eat the rich.

[–] Swarfega@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Has this been posted on Reddit itself anywhere. I'd be interested to read users comments

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] itsgroundhogdayagain@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I think he is seriously devaluing someone giving those mods Reddit Gold

[–] autumn@social.raincloud.dev 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] cumskin_genocide@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago

Jannies are gonna janny. When resetera was sold off and the jannies still decided to work for free you know that they get paid in power. Same with the reddit jannies and the api fiasco last summer.

[–] NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml -1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So what, give the CEO half and pay the rest to the mods? Like 1300 bucks per year without tax and fees. What would be left? 50 bucks per month? Reddit has like 75000 moderators. Some for huge Subreddits, some for small ones. Equal pay? Or what?

Someone has to organize all that paying, many are in different countries, different tax laws. In the end, there would be like 20 bucks per month for each. You then would also require extra heavy checks for moderation quality to ensure they are worth their pay. You'd need systems to prevent abuse. If there's money involved, people become extra greedy. Just pay some of them? Only the ones working a few hours per day? Pay per moderating action? What?

Or you just do double pay for the CEO. Seems like a no-brainer.

[–] KeenFlame@feddit.nu 2 points 1 year ago

It is a no brainier in the complete opposite direction you proposed

[–] Syrc@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

…or you invest the money in actually making your platform decent and adding features mods have been asking for years. But then big number doesn’t go up so it’s a bad idea I guess.

[–] NotJustForMe@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I guess I would also answer that with controversial opinion.

They don't want a better platform. Reddit does exactly what they want it to do. To generate tons of discussions about the same things, over and over again. To generate loads of different feelings and situations. To create a very diverse pool of data.

They might have started out with a good ideology, but then success came.

I like to compare it with Quora. It could have been the best site of its kind. But it served its purpose, being a feed-bucket for an AI, and now it's not even moderated anymore. And they did pay their users and mods, but it didn't work out, too many tiny transactions, only like a handful of people got anything, and those abused it like crazy.

Just my take on it. Such payment models won't work. A few giants will earn the majority, and they will cheat and fight for it, the rest will still get nothing. They could have taken three thirds of that CEO money to create a few resident jobs. But why bother, Reddit is exactly how they want it to be. Most users just don't realize the pseudo-scam, believing it's their favorite discussion platform that they can influence, while the creators have a content-generator with free labor in mind.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] XEAL@lemm.ee -2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They're paid with the joy of being powertripping censoring assholes

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] maniac@lemmy.world -2 points 1 year ago

Moderators get a feeling of power. I've never heard a reddit mod say they want money.

[–] TruthAintEasy@kbin.social -2 points 1 year ago

Clean up my comments, chat Janitors! - some guy who made me lmao on a pretty good mobile games chat

load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›