this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2024
636 points (98.3% liked)

Science Memes

14645 readers
2150 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 24 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Rongbipper@lemmy.ca 46 points 1 year ago

Have this on my camera roll from 2016 lmao

[–] don@lemm.ee 27 points 1 year ago

Those moles have seen some shit.

[–] scaryjelly@lemm.ee 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Americans will use anything but the metric system.

[–] RandomVideos@programming.dev 9 points 1 year ago

At least they tried using it this time

[–] lgmjon64@lemmy.world 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure we used this textbook in my highschool chemistry class. Or at least it also used that illustration.

[–] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 1 year ago

i distinctly recognize those weird eyes

[–] sirico@feddit.uk 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's clearly more than a litter of mole

[–] oce@jlai.lu 2 points 1 year ago

Is it? What if you press them down to fill the gaps?

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay, but how many moles of mole per mole are we talking about?

[–] Natanael@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] RobMyBot@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

And yet, no more than 1

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Wüge

https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/wug

For anyone else confused about this comment. :)

Wow, you guys are abstract!

[–] lugal@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

It was a running gag in a linguistics meme page on The Other Side. I'm impressed you made the effort to research it!

[–] watersnipje@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ok but why are they naked?

[–] Midnitte@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

The real question is, why aren't they wearing proper PPE?

[–] SturgiesYrFase@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

Maybe they just feel more comfortable that way, don't yuck their yumm my dude!

[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Stupid question. Why are you?

[–] MonkderZweite@feddit.ch 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Standardized mole.

[–] Nacktmull@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Just two? We build whole societies, you know.

This is a conjecture, at best.

How do I verify the beaker’s volume is actually a litre?