this post was submitted on 19 Mar 2024
641 points (89.6% liked)

General Discussion

12887 readers
1 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy.World General!

This is a community for general discussion where you can get your bearings in the fediverse. Discuss topics & ask questions that don't seem to fit in any other community, or don't have an active community yet.


🪆 About Lemmy World


🧭 Finding CommunitiesFeel free to ask here or over in: !lemmy411@lemmy.ca!

Also keep an eye on:

For more involved tools to find communities to join: check out Lemmyverse!


💬 Additional Discussion Focused Communities:


Rules and Policies

Remember, Lemmy World rules also apply here.0. See: Rules for Users.

  1. No bigotry: including racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, or xenophobia.
  2. Be respectful. Everyone should feel welcome here.
  3. Be thoughtful and helpful: even with ‘silly’ questions. The world won’t be made better by dismissive comments to others on Lemmy.
  4. Link posts should include some context/opinion in the body text when the title is unaltered, or be titled to encourage discussion.
  5. Posts concerning other instances' activity/decisions are better suited to !fediverse@lemmy.world or !lemmydrama@lemmy.world communities.
  6. No Ads/Spamming.
  7. No NSFW content.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 6) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kalysta@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

I’d personally abolish the senate and leave the house alone, or change the house to one rep per every x number of people instead of whatever we do now.

[–] bobgray123987@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Add political appointments can be recalled by the voters.

[–] 3volver@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

That's interesting, how would that work? If a political appointment was recalled, there would need to be another vote right? I think it gets pretty muddy, what's to stop bad actors from immediately voting to recall the politician they didn't want to win?

[–] locke@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Perhaps this is just my European wallet talking, but $50k/y income = rich people. I'm sure there are states in USA where this is also true.

That sort of a change would totally crash tax income?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gedaliyah@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I could get behind 90% of this. Find me that candidate/party and I would vote for them!

[–] KillingTimeItself@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

mandatory voting is not something i agree with.

The house and senate should both exist, they both serve a purpose. The senate gives every state an equal footing, the house gives every state representation in regards to population, so they both serve a very explicit purpose.

idk about house rep cap. There are already so many, perhaps improve the makeup of the reps though? That's pretty messy.

on the supreme court term limit, include an age limit as well.

That's it, everything else would be fine probably?

[–] ThunderclapSasquatch@startrek.website 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I agree with you, I think uncapping the house is the right move however, it'd give the people a more representative vote while the Senate maintains State interests

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›