this post was submitted on 24 Oct 2024
1232 points (92.4% liked)

Science Memes

14630 readers
234 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
(page 3) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jenny_ball@lemmy.world 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Erasmus@lemmy.world 5 points 7 months ago

Yeah this doesn’t do squat to prove or disprove anything to these nutters.

I’ve done the same with a variety of other things and you will get told the same thing:

God put it here.

Thing is you cannot argue with the above statement because it falls into that sort of argument you used to have when you were a child when the other kid would say ‘Nyah! Last word!!’ or ‘I can’t hear you!!’

nO ThAT’s jUSt gOD tEStiNg yOuR FAiTh

🤦‍♂️

[–] RecluseRamble@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 7 months ago

The correct answer would have been: "Why should I? You're an idiot."

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 4 points 6 months ago

"Whatever! Pssshhh!"

[–] stupidcasey@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

If uranium-238 can be Fused in a star why couldn’t lead be Fused directly and in tern all the elements in between.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rooskie91@discuss.online 4 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The tragedy is that humans aren't convinced to change their minds by facts like this. They're convinced by good stories from their friends and family.

[–] shalafi@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago

And Facebook, but I'm just repeating what you said, aren't I?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lolola@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

This would mean that there was more uranium around millions and billions of years in the past so why isn't there any evidence of prehistoric nukes in the fossil record

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] skozzii@lemmy.ca 3 points 6 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›