Might still run fine, though
INeedMana
For anyone wondering, like I was: link is legit. No PII/login needed
And the crazy thing is, buying the rights might actually be a not so bad idea from marketing POV
Could it be that this way they are trying to force someone's hand on some funding?
I hope it won't
How did the facility plan got accepted by the local administration?
climate-as-a-service
I haven't been paying attention to GPU market lately, are you actually asking about 9060?
In such case, it seems this is the review you might be looking for
Then it's not even a year old. The things that see the most movements performance wise are focused on AMD and NVidia. I'm not convinced there will be a huge difference between what he measured then and what you would measure today. If you are comparing that card with a newer one, the latter will probably get better performance. If the difference in performance is worth the difference in price, only you can decide
There is https://www.phoronix.com/review/intel-battlemage-linux-may2025/2 but that is not cross-referenced to the other one
My point is, the last time Phoronix did a review on b580, 9600 was not even on the graph yet. When it comes to gaming hardware on Linux, I don't know of any better place than Phoronix. He does the tests really using a Linux box, really running games (or computing) and sometimes even runs tests again when there is some big release of Mesa etc.
But when trying to decide which generation to buy you most probably have to glue together how the thing you are eyeing compares to the other thing, by comparing both to another one that is present in both comparisons
now one BNPL provider has announced a deal with a gaming company to allow people to finance in-game purchases.
Great, another data leech for marketing machine
offers interest-free biweekly payment plans
Uh-huh. I wonder, what do they monetize on, if the debt is interest-free. Surely this is only to grow user base. No basket analysis at all...
Reading your exchange here, one thing comes to my mind. One of the core principles of open source was that if you were distributed something, you have to retain the right and possibility to modify it to your use case. And if you're going to distribute it yourself, you have to disclose the source of what you distribute. So in the OS spirit, even if creators put guards in place, end users have to be able to modify what was distributed to them
Play it with the "In the Hall of the Mountain King" in the background