this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
131 points (100.0% liked)

TechTakes

1852 readers
459 users here now

Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.

This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.

For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
dgerard@awful.systems
131
People are ‘blatantly stealing my work,’ AI artist complains - with notes on a similar appeal that failed hard just recently (pivot-to-ai.com)
submitted 7 months ago by dgerard@awful.systems to c/techtakes@awful.systems
46 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Grimy@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago (1 children)

So midjourney give it's users ownership, as do all the other image generation services.

That being said, what you quoted means that if someone generates an image and then further modifies it, then they can copyright it. If all they did was prompt the model and nothing else, then it isn't possible to copyright.