this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
980 points (97.9% liked)

memes

17890 readers
1379 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/Ads/AI SlopNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live. We also consider AI slop to be spam in this community and is subject to removal.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Until Google demanded from its vassal (Mozilla) the removal of support for extensions. Mozilla doesn't have enough resources to do without Google

[–] ThomasLadder_69@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

When did this happen?

[–] purrtastic@lemmy.nz 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I have no idea why you’re getting down voted. It’s essentially true.

The arrangement is vital for Mozilla. According to the Mozilla Foundation’s 2021–2022 financial statement, which is the most recent one published, $510 million out of its $593 million in revenue came courtesy of Google’s search payments. https://fortune.com/2024/08/05/mozilla-firefox-biggest-potential-loser-google-antitrust-search-ruling/

[–] chemicalwonka@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unfortunately it happens more frequently than I'd like

1000029660

[–] yamanii@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

So open themselves up for more antitrust lawsuits? Telling another browser what to do.