Pull request #10974 introduces the @bitwarden/sdk-internal dependency which is needed to build the desktop client. The dependency contains a licence statement which contains the following clause:

You may not use this SDK to develop applications for use with software other than Bitwarden (including non-compatible implementations of Bitwarden) or to develop another SDK.

This violates freedom 0.

It is not possible to build desktop-v2024.10.0 (or, likely, current master) without removing this dependency.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 15 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Does anyone have experience with keyguard? From a cursory glance, this + vaultwarden seems like a good alternative...

[–] midnightblue@lemmy.ca 4 points 7 months ago

I just tried it out and I'm amazed. It looks and feels just like 1Password, my absolute favorite password manager (before I switched to Bitwarden, because 1Password is proprietary and pretty expensive)

I definitely recommend it

[–] unrushed233@lemmings.world 1 points 7 months ago

It definitely has a nicer design and blends in well with the rest of the system (at least on Android)

[–] qaz@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

License

The source code is available for personal use only.

That doesn't really seem like an improvement, although do they say they're planning on releasing it under the FSL.

[–] smiletolerantly@awful.systems 3 points 7 months ago

Ah damn it -.-

Too bad, the app is really nice to use :/