this post was submitted on 20 Dec 2024

94 points (100.0% liked)

Cybersecurity

5 readers

19 users here now

An umbrella community for all things cybersecurity / infosec. News, research, questions, are all welcome!

Rules

Community Rules

Be kind
Limit promotional activities
Non-cybersecurity posts should be redirected to other communities within infosec.pub.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

shellsharks@fedia.io

tweedge@fedia.io

94

So, why do almost all banks, in the U.S. at least, only support the worst 2FA authentication method exclusively? And, this article doesn't mention SIM-swap attacks, which are unavoidable. It can't be (hear-me.social)

submitted 5 months ago by Jerry@hear-me.social to c/cybersecurity@fedia.io

19 comments fedilink hide all child comments

So, why do almost all banks, in the U.S. at least, only support the worst 2FA authentication method exclusively? And, this article doesn't mention SIM-swap attacks, which are unavoidable. It can't be that difficult to support an authenticator app.

https://gizmodo.com/feds-warn-sms-authentication-is-unsafe-after-worst-hack-in-our-nations-history-2000541129

#Cybersecurity

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] seathru@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 months ago

I love my CU, but their app is an afterthought that tries (unsuccessfully) to use google authenticator. And if you try to call for tech support, you get whatever teller was unlucky enough to answer the phone.

Bless their hearts; they're trying. And I'd rather give them my business than any for-profit bank.