this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2024
106 points (94.9% liked)

Technology

64937 readers
4030 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Disable JavaScript, to bypass paywall.

  1. Install NoScript browser addon.
  2. Disable using native Chrome site settings.
  • Sundar Pichai said Google cut manager, director, and VP roles by 10% as part of an efficiency drive.
  • Google has sought to boost efficiency by reducing layers and reorganizing teams.
  • The company has been facing challenges from OpenAI and other AI rivals.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Alphane_Moon@lemmy.world 32 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Archive

I wonder what the process was for choosing specifically 10%. Why not 8.7%? Or 13.9%? Surely an efficiency drive would have some sort of structured/analytical approach to it?

[–] ownsauce@lemmy.world 29 points 2 months ago

Sounds good to investors

[–] subignition@piefed.social 27 points 2 months ago

Some nerd probably wanted to be able to say they literally decimated their management teams

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 21 points 2 months ago (2 children)

After an engineer is there long enough, they’re likely to become a manager. They’re way more expensive to keep around. Google wants to lay them off and churn them for college grads. Looks better for PR if they say it’s an “efficiency push” rather than “we don’t like to retain employees because it’s expensive.” So this was definitely an arbitrary number

[–] pineapple_pizza@lemmy.dexlit.xyz 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

To be fair, it's totally possible that they just have too much management. Then you get into a case where a very large portion of everyone's job is endlessly trying to keep in any with various management and you end up with too many managers competing for not enough work which makes the environment more political

[–] kautau@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Certainly possible, and I’ve definitely been a part of orgs with just too much management, but I’m wary of Google saying that, considering how many products they kill every year. I’m sure there would certainly be space for their employees to expand horizontally if their product lineup wasn’t so volatile

[–] Odelay42@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

This isn't as true in tech companies as it was in traditional companies years ago. Most high level engineers take an individual contributor role that allow you to be promoted without becoming a manager. At Google it's called a staff role. At Amazon it's a principal role.

[–] avidamoeba@lemmy.ca 7 points 2 months ago

Surely an efficiency drive would have some sort of structured/analytical approach to it?

LOL

[–] Greg@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 months ago

Or even 200% ¯\_(ツ)_/¯