this post was submitted on 27 Dec 2024
180 points (97.9% liked)

AnarchyChess

5377 readers
65 users here now

Holy hell

Other chess communities:
!Chess@lemmy.ml
!chessbeginners@sh.itjust.works

Matrix space

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Black to move. Bishop takes knight. Checkmate. What am I missing here?

E: oh it was white to move. The triple fork doesn’t matter. White should move the rook across to below the bishop.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago (2 children)
[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sorry I don’t get the UI. Did white just move the knight? Or is it whites move?

[–] takenaps@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

White just moved the knight, black to play

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Well yeah, that’s mate in one.

I’m wondering why white would move the knight like that for the triple fork. I was thinking white would move the rook. Still white is in bad shape here.

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

It's not mate in one, it's mate in two. White can block the bishop with the D pawn.

Kc5+ - Bxc5+
d4 - Bxd4#

[–] jaybone@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago

Oh yes, of course. You are right. The pawn buys one extra move.

[–] takenaps@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 2 months ago

So mate in two. Not in one.