this post was submitted on 25 Feb 2025
357 points (97.6% liked)

World News

41275 readers
3785 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A couple on a Qatar Airways flight from Melbourne to Doha was forced to sit next to a deceased passenger for four hours after she collapsed and died mid-flight.

The flight crew moved the woman’s body to an empty seat beside them and denied their request to change seats.

Qatar Airways apologized but did not offer the couple support after the incident.

The couple, en route to Venice, criticized the airline’s handling of the situation but are trying to continue their trip despite the distressing experience.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] latesleeper@lemmy.world 53 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I think the only thing they're pissed about is the airline didn't allow them to move seats after they put the woman not in her original seat and probably being forced to stay on the plane longer than needed, potentially missing their connection to Venice, while medics came on board to haul her away.

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 47 points 20 hours ago (3 children)

If the flight wasn't full and they didn't allow them to move seats that's extremely messed up.

[–] Broken@lemmy.ml 6 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Technically, there was at least 1 free seat since the woman wasn't using it anymore.

But that begs the question, assuming the entire plane was full then the lady was sitting next to at least one other person. They moved her from that seat to be in next to the couple in question. So it seems to me there is no situation where it's not extremely messed up.

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 2 points 7 hours ago

Yeah the only thing I could think of was that maybe the couple didn't want to split up and there was only 1 other free seat.

But I think we'll just learn that the airline was being incompetent.

[–] kyle@lemm.ee 27 points 17 hours ago (1 children)

Honestly they could've secured the body to one of the flight staff seats. If there's no extra, the flight attendant could sit next to a passenger.

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 3 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

That's a good point. Wonder why they didn't just do that?

[–] Krukenberg@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Cause flight crew are seated next to emergency exits for a reason. Safety > inconvenience

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 1 points 4 hours ago

Most of the planes I've been on had at least some crew seats tucked into the back and out of the way of the primary exits if I am remembering correctly. There probably is a good reason, such as tripping hazards for the crew doing their work or the seats not really being effective for long term seating and keeping the body in place (I'm thinking of the fold down crew seats).

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Even if it was full they should have found an alternate method of securing the body. They’re already dead, they don’t need a seat.

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 16 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I think the problem likely comes down to safety and respect for the dead.

Put the body in the back galley and suddenly the plane hits rough turbulence and that body is now a +100 pound projectile.

Putting the body in a bathroom seems better, but that turbulence hits and now the body is flying around in there during the rough turbulence, and then the next day the media is lambasting the air line for desecrating the body or whatever.

[–] Catoblepas@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Then not having an alternate plan in place is on the airline, if there was nothing else the crew could do.

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 11 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

I think it's more the nature of modern air craft. There isn't much spare room and space is extremely expensive on planes. Meanwhile, these deaths rarely occur.

There's probably some way to design a system to secure a body in the bathroom, however, and I broadly agree with you that they should have some type of solution.

[–] ipkpjersi@lemmy.ml 1 points 8 hours ago (1 children)

I think that's probably too morbid if they have a death seat designed into airplanes.

Besides, what if two passengers die on the plane?

[–] robbinhood@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago

I imagine any solution they come up with will be out of sight until it's needed and you could equip multiple bathrooms or whatever space. Although two people dying like this is probably astronomically rare.