this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
56 points (93.8% liked)

Ukraine

8799 readers
796 users here now

News and discussion related to Ukraine

Matrix Space

Community Rules

πŸ‡ΊπŸ‡¦ Sympathy for enemy combatants is prohibited.

🌻🀒No content depicting extreme violence or gore.

πŸ’₯Posts containing combat footage should include [Combat] in title

🚷Combat videos containing any footage of a visible human involved must be flagged NSFW

❗ Server Rules

  1. Remember the human! (no harassment, threats, etc.)
  2. No racism or other discrimination
  3. No Nazis, QAnon or similar
  4. No porn
  5. No ads or spam (includes charities)
  6. No content against Finnish law

πŸ’³πŸ’₯ Donate to support Ukraine's Defense

πŸ’³βš•οΈβ›‘οΈ Donate to support Humanitarian Aid

πŸͺ– 🫑 Volunteer with the International Legionnaires

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
lisko@sopuli.xyz
doo@sh.itjust.works
Burstar@sopuli.xyz
Tuuktuuk@sopuli.xyz
56
'Military equipment and the right to fight on' β€” Trump on what US minerals deal gives Ukraine (kyivindependent.com)
submitted 2 days ago by Cephalotrocity@biglemmowski.win to c/ukraine@sopuli.xyz
16 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

The deal gives Ukraine "military equipment and the right to fight on, and originally, the right to fight," Trump said.

The finalized agreement, dated Feb. 24, reportedly offers Kyiv no security guarantees in exchange for 50% of revenues from the "future monetization" of Ukraine's state-owned mineral resources.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] dotdi@lemmy.world 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I hate it but it actually could be strategically the right move. This war could stretch for another few years. Which means by the time Ukraine actually ramps up their minerals business the orange baby hopefully is out of office (and behind bars). And then this bullshit contract can be thrown out or renegotiated.

[–] Madison420@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Yeah I'd immediately abandon that deal as soon as it's useful to do so just like the US did with the 92 security agreement they reneged on.

[–] Typotyper@sh.itjust.works 4 points 2 days ago

And NAFTA free trade agreement (I added the redundancy to help the dunces)

load more comments (1 replies)