this post was submitted on 26 Feb 2025
355 points (94.0% liked)

Open Source

33428 readers
327 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Not a good look for Firefox. Third partners and device fingerprinting clearly mentioned in the documents.

The move is the latest development in a series of shifts Mozilla has undergone over the past year.

The gecko engine and Firefox forks, such as Tor, Mullvad, Librewolf, and Arkenfox, are stables of private, open source web browsing.

In fact, Mozilla's is one of the few browser engines out there, in a protocol-heavy industry that many say only corporate or well-funded non-profits can reliably develop.

What is more, daily driving the more hardened-for-privacy Firefox derivatives can be frowned upon by many sites, including your bank and workplace.

Mozilla's enshittification leaves the open source community without a good alternative to Firefox, after years of promoting it as a privacy-friendly alternative to spyware-cum-browser Chrome.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Reductionism is lazy and sucks. You didn't even read the comment you responded to, you're just mad that not everyone is upset enough for you.

[–] Coldmoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 day ago (2 children)

No, not particularly. I’m not that upset myself, I recently switched to Librewolf. I just get annoyed at what I perceive as statements that ride the fence. Privacy is not a place to give ground on.

[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 7 points 1 day ago

Did it ever occur to you that people can have a mix of views that don't fully conform to one ideology or another? It's a spectrum, not riding the fence. Like politics, not everything is a team sport.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

I suppose Mozilla should lock the doors and institute slave labor rather than find some way of paying their employees that might be construed by you to be giving up privacy

[–] Coldmoon@sh.itjust.works 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Now that’s a mental leap to get there.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Oh, I thought we have to take extreme positions

[–] Coldmoon@sh.itjust.works 2 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Well if that’s the case just dismantle the whole thing and return to the woods

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -2 points 17 hours ago (1 children)
[–] Coldmoon@sh.itjust.works 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

https://lemmy.zip/post/32996169

Yeah bro we should totally be chill with this bro it’s just a TOS bro they have to pay their employees bro

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -2 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

Say bro a few more times -- it really makes me look unintelligent that you both do that and can't understand a view that isn't black/white

[–] Coldmoon@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

bro this is embarrassing bro. please bro.

woosh

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world -1 points 2 hours ago

I got the joke you were trying to make, poorly. It just wasn't funny.