this post was submitted on 02 Mar 2025
737 points (99.6% liked)

Science Memes

12651 readers
3055 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 6 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Cunningham's Law, where are you?

[–] Smokeydope@lemmy.world 9 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Why does there gotta be so many psudo-scientific internet 'laws' of common human behavioral archetypes with a half baked Wikipedia entry? Can I have SmokeyDopes Law where if more than two humans ever exhibit the same behavior or particular complex that eventually there will be some armchair academic undergrad who will attempt to needlessly define it just to get to say "complex-fancy-sirname's law"

[–] riquisimo@lemmy.dbzer0.com 14 points 3 days ago

"Why does there gotta be so many psudo-scientific internet 'laws' of common human behavioral archetypes with a half baked Wikipedia entry?"

Because of SmokeyDope's law.

"If more than two humans ever exhibit the same behavior or particular complex that eventually there will be some armchair academic undergrad who will attempt to needlessly define it just to get to say "complex-fancy-sirname's law" "

[–] foofiepie@lemmy.world 11 points 3 days ago

Smokeydope’s law right there. Typical telltale signs.

[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

Tbf, Cunningham's law doesn't have a Wikipedia entry unto itself, just a subsection in the biography of the sort-of kind-of coiner of the aphorism. And it's not trying to be scientific or academic; the law is just a light-hearted joke that people are less likely to answer questions on the Internet than they are to correct statements.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Can I have SmokeyDopes Law where if more than two humans ever exhibit the same behavior or particular complex that eventually there will be some armchair academic undergrad who will attempt to needlessly define it just to get to say "complex-fancy-sirname's law"

No.

[–] MathiasTCK@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

What do you think it is, bankruptcy?