this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
388 points (79.0% liked)

Memes

47488 readers
1630 users here now

Rules:

  1. Be civil and nice.
  2. Try not to excessively repost, as a rule of thumb, wait at least 2 months to do it if you have to.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

No, RCV wouldn't. The fundamental problem of electoral politics being a game between factions pre-approved by the bourgeoisie won't change, there are even safeguards preventing unwanted change that losing parties and government branches can pull in the rare event a worker party won.

It's the perfect carrot, it won't get passed nor would it change much.

[–] Sibshops@lemm.ee 1 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

Even though RCV improves representation by only like 3%-6%. it's still an improvement.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RepresentWomen#Ranked_Choice_Voting

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 2 points 23 hours ago

Sure, I won't make the claim that it's a bad thing over FPTP. My argument is that focusing on Electoral Reform is wasted energy when it is ultimately easier to get compehensive change through via Revolution, and I'd argue Revolution is still required regardless.