this post was submitted on 07 Mar 2025
27 points (96.6% liked)
Fediverse
18490 readers
48 users here now
A community dedicated to fediverse news and discussion.
Fediverse is a portmanteau of "federation" and "universe".
Getting started on Fediverse;
- What is the fediverse?
- Fediverse Platforms
- How to run your own community
founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
We never know what the future holds. But one of our goals is to decentralize social media. If we wind up with only a few major players, we have failed in that goal.
Well... Is that true, I wonder. Is that what decentralization means?
Software wise, these are open-source projects with strong community contribution. Just a few major players doesn't imply just a few major servers, so no one company or project can ever truly dominate.
Additionally, just the threat of forking could be enough of a deterrent for more authoritarian services not to implement anti-user features. Say Lemmy sells out or something; Lemmy.ml might turn bad, but that means nothing to .world or .ee or any other server. They can just... Not update. Not implement the bad features. Lemmy can just be forked. That's not like Twitter or Facebook.
Right?
I'm not a tech wizz or anything, but that's my understanding of the spiel of the thing of the stuff.