this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
1090 points (99.4% liked)

Buy European

2191 readers
3525 users here now

Overview:

The community to discuss buying European goods and services.

Matrix Chat

Related Communities:

Buy Local:

!buycanadian@lemmy.ca

!buyafrican@baraza.africa

!buyfromeu@feddit.org

Buying and Selling:

!flohmarkt@lemmy.ca

Boycott:

!boycottus@lemmy.ca


Banner credits: BYTEAlliance


founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 18 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

TBH I think any more low orbit telecom satellite arrays than we already have are just going to become a huge problem in the following decades.

[–] x00z@lemmy.world 2 points 48 minutes ago

I hate the fact that they just got "permission" to destroy the view of the nightsky.

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 14 points 8 hours ago

Starlink is already being a problem currently, and it's not even fully deployed

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 5 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

This has been commented before.

Starlink flies at a very low altitude, meaning relatively high atmospheric drag, and a very short period of time before their sats deorbit if they go dead, less than ten years.

It's nowhere near the problem everyone makes it out to be.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 7 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

Until we find out that not nearly as much burns up on re-entry as assumed and they've been raining carcinogens for decades.

[–] Ilovethebomb@lemm.ee 4 points 5 hours ago

I didn't say it wasn't a problem at all.

[–] finitebanjo@lemmy.world 8 points 7 hours ago

Official statemens claim they run for about 5 years, deorbit anywhere, and do NOT always burn up in reentry.