this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2025
374 points (91.6% liked)

Economics

1883 readers
11 users here now

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] horse_battery_staple@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Chernobyl was much worse than it had any need to be due to meddling from political officers and a general structure of fear of challenging them. A failed test light started the problem however shutting down the plant before it got out of hand was delayed. Also. it was not reported to the wider affected world until the Swedes raised the alarm after fallout had reached their detectors.

https://www.chernobylgallery.com/chernobyl-disaster/timeline/

https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-1986-08-19-mn-16808-story.html

https://www.voiceofbelarus.com/how-and-why-authorities-hid-truth-about-chernobyl/

The average Soviet farmer rarely benefitted from their labor.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Agriculture_in_the_Soviet_Union

The same for the average factory worker.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wage_reform_in_the_Soviet_Union,_1956%E2%80%931962

Then you only need to look to the current oligarchs and where they came from in the fall of the Soviet Union to see how wealth was already stratified in such a way as Clinton and Western banks could assist in raiding what was left of the Soviet coffers.

https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2022/03/22/1087654279/how-shock-therapy-created-russian-oligarchs-and-paved-the-path-for-putin

https://jacobin.com/2017/03/russia-us-clinton-boris-yeltsin-elections-interference-trump/

The Soviet system being inherently top down and heirarchal is susceptible to Dictatorship and political hegemony. It is patently not a good system. I don't need to even get into the minor rebellions Trotsky put down or the rise of Stalin and his famine.

[โ€“] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 day ago

Chernobyl was a cascading list of failures not unique to Socialism, nor incapable of being solved. Fukushima was also a cascading list of failures in a Capitalist country. Are you just anti-Nuclear? There can be some legitimacy to that, but to blame a nuclear disaster on Socialism specifically when similar failures happen in Capitalism is wrong, it's a procedural issue.

As for the Peasantry and Proletariat, wealth disparity drastically shrank, while GDP grew dramatically:

Metrics improved drastically. Life expectancy doubled, literacy rates went from the low 30s to 99.9%, healthcare and education both became free and grew to be high quality, the economy was democratized, and working hours lowered as compared to Capitalism. Famine, when previously common, was ended. If you want to blame Socialism for famine in a country that had regular famines, you need to credit it for ending famine as well.

I don't know what you mean by the Soviet system being "susceptible to dictatorship" any more than any other system, it was both top-down and bottom-up. The Working Class held control of the State and oppressed the bourgeoisie.