this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
658 points (96.2% liked)

Canada

8736 readers
2369 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


πŸ—ΊοΈ Provinces / Territories


πŸ™οΈ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


πŸ’ SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


πŸ’» Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


πŸ’΅ Finance, Shopping, Sales


πŸ—£οΈ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] boke@sh.itjust.works 184 points 22 hours ago (10 children)

This isn’t a show of force, it’s a demonstration for Canada who is planning to buy a number of these submarines from France.

[–] jimd@lemmy.ca 1 points 31 minutes ago

What's the point of these submarines if there aren't nukes on them?

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 10 points 5 hours ago

Regardless, it's presence makes a statement that Canada is not alone.

Though I'd be cool if it was stationed at Miquelon for a few months.

They don't need attack subs. They need boomer subs. At this point, Canada needs a nuclear deterrent. And I say that as an American who would be in the cross hairs of said nuclear deterrent. Canada should contract with the French for protection under their umbrella until they can build some of their own. The lesson of Ukraine should be that nukes protect small nations from fascist larger ones. Canada could easily end up like Ukraine. It's not like fascists can't find a casus belli. Putin was "restoring Russian glory" or some such. Trump would be "finishing the American Revolution" or some other bullshit.

Please, Canada, from a friend of yours to the south, do not take this threat lightly. No one is going to be able to save you if the US decides to invade. The same oceans that protect you will prevent your rescue. The only hope Canada will ever have of being able to militarily protect its borders from the US is a credible nuclear deterrent.

Just please, don't harden your hearts while you build these weapons of destruction. Don't close your doors to refugees from the US. As someone who is on the regime's enemies list, hopping across the Canadian border and begging for asylum is the last chance I might have if things really go bad.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 6 hours ago

I mean, they're not mutually exclusive. Nobody was about to start openly threatening the Americans, but having French forces around and mulling over defence deals with France sends a signal.

We don't know what Macron and Trudeau talked about, but accelerating things like this in light of the new reality could well have been part of it.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

Also a great and well deserved middle finger to Australia

[–] Evkob@lemmy.ca 77 points 21 hours ago

You're right, thanks for adding context. I'm immediately suspicious when a picture is posted with no accompanying news article, and my search wasn't turning up any articles, only social media links.

Here's a French article about it.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 29 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Australia watching on with regret.

[–] pupbiru@aussie.zone 7 points 8 hours ago

right?! gawwwwwwd we’re so fucking captured

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 17 points 21 hours ago (2 children)
[–] Gronk@aussie.zone 13 points 14 hours ago (2 children)

Morrison knew what he was doing, the sub deal was to poison the chalice before Labor gained the majority.

Unfortunately for the walking sack of salmonella and shitty curry, his wrangler (Murdoch) managed to sway the election enough to get the LNP back in power.

I have actually met Morrison in person once (friends of friends of friends) and he is a fucking moron but JFC he's at least a brain cell or two ahead of Dutton

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 8 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

I dunno .. Dutton seems smarter, but more evil. Morrison just seems like a brainwashed idiot who's failed upwards. I don't know how anyone looks at the screaming void of evil that is Dutton and thinks "yeah that thing has my best interests at heart .. or a heart"

[–] Gronk@aussie.zone 5 points 8 hours ago

They're just two different flavours of evil, Morrison is a happy clapper pentecostalist "God favours the rich" evil and Dutton is an ex-corrupt cop who wants authoritarianism under his rule evil.

They both don't have the critical thinking to realise the damage they do or why men like them shouldn't hold positions of power, but Dutton following right out of Trumps playbook despite international backlash is a pretty good case for dumb-as-fuck syndrome.

But I agree, it's absurd that we have these stooges running for parliament I don't know how we got here..

[–] Hansae@lemmy.dbzer0.com 5 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

I'm still not entirely sure how Australia seemingly wound up with a modified Westminster system that was worse than the original, genuinely pretty impressive.

[–] Lodespawn@aussie.zone 3 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

Arguably at least we have proportional representation. FPTP sucks.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 8 hours ago

at least we have proportional representation

Only in the Senate. And only on a per-state basis, so it's only as proportional as "a proportion of 6" can be...which is much less proportional than a proportion of 40, like if the Senate were done nationally.

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 7 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

We knew that BEFORE the election and yet elected the LNP anyway, fuck voters.

[–] AmosBurton_ThatGuy@lemmy.ca 5 points 14 hours ago

Could be worse, you could be a murican α••( ᐛ )α•—

[–] yannic@lemmy.ca 14 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

Yes, this old news is about a nuclear-powered attack submarine, not necessarily a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

[–] Sylvartas@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 5 hours ago

IIRC only 2 out of the 9 french subs in service exclusively carry torpedoes and anti-ship missiles (Rubis class). I'm sure the 3 Suffren class with no second strike capabilities could still deliver some sort of short ranged tac nuke. So there are high chances that this is a submarine that can nuclear-attack.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 8 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Lamp Oil, Rope, Nuclear Subs? You want it? It's yours, my friend. As looong as you have enough Euros.

[–] Isaac@waterloolemmy.ca 12 points 12 hours ago

Khajit has wares, if you have coin.