Firefox

20357 readers

122 users here now

/c/firefox

A place to discuss the news and latest developments on the open-source browser Firefox.

Rules

1. Adhere to the instance rules

2. Be kind to one another

3. Communicate in a civil manner

Reporting

If you would like to bring an issue to the moderators attention, please use the "Create Report" feature on the offending comment or post and it will be reviewed as time allows.

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

k_o_t@lemmy.ml

golden_zealot@lemmy.ml

Mozilla’s response to proposed remedies in U.S. v. Google | The Mozilla Blog (blog.mozilla.org)

submitted 4 months ago by that_leaflet@lemmy.world to c/firefox@lemmy.ml

31 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] XenGi@feddit.org 25 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As long as is it millions it's too much.

[–] LWD@lemm.ee 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (2 children)

deleted by creator

[–] possiblylinux127@lemmy.zip 10 points 4 months ago

I would make more sense if the CEO was doing a good job

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 months ago

I think the more realistic argument is that CEOs have an inherent incentive to take big risks. If they get lucky and succeed, they get credited for the win, can put it in their portfolio and then demand better pay or move on to another company which will pay them more. If they fail, they can quietly resign, take the golden parachute and move on to the next company after a year or two as though nothing has happened. A big salary incentivizes them to keep their job, thus disincentivizing them from taking risks.