this post was submitted on 11 Mar 2025
583 points (97.4% liked)

World News

43677 readers
2471 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] MooseyMoose@lemmy.world -3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 16 hours ago) (2 children)

Planning on international child trafficking this time? Quite progressive abduction policy. Fucking Catholic Buddhist child abusers. How is it they get a pass? "Oh that whole tongue sucking thing was just a joke!" SMDH

Clarification: they are the Catholicism of Buddhism in my view (read up on the history of abuses they committed, cutting off peasants hands, gouging out eyes, regularly abducting kids from families)

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 9 hours ago (1 children)

This has already been pretty heavily discussed down below.

https://vger.app/inbox/lemmynsfw.com/c/world@lemmy.world/comments/22949064/0.10764805.10764949.10767861.10770960.10780683.10781641

Take aways: don't be racist judging by a sexualised western lens. If there's more, you'd think that the PRC would have had everyone shouting it from the root tops by now right?

As for the corporeal punishment, the most extreme cases had already been legislated against in the decades before 1951.
But even if they hadn't, which they had, I don't think you agree that human rights deficiency is justification for invasion and annexation. The Qing Empire's slow slicing and other forms of corporeal punishment, child sex cases, etc., didn't justify Imperial Japan, the British, Germans, or whomever's, imperial expansion.

[–] MooseyMoose@lemmy.world 1 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

Reformed theocracy as a form of government is peachy keen then? LOL. "We said we're sorry and we won't do the eye gouging thing anymore, now let us resume the child abduction."

As soon as the US gives all the land back to natives and pays reparations to blacks and repatriates the money stolen from workers by the capitalists I'll consider the idea of China relinquishing Tibet back to the theocracy (I probably won't to be fair since we know that will never happen).

Also tongue sucking is a Tibetan greeting now is it? How TF you can say "western sexualized lens" with a straight face is mind boggling.

[–] Semjaza@lemmynsfw.com 1 points 7 hours ago

Could be peachy, we won't know since their self governance and ability to have their own Tibetan characteristic revolution has now been completely quashed.

I linked the other comment for a reason. If Tibetans and people from that culture don't seem to think it's a big deal, I'm inclined to agree them rather than trample over them because they're backwards ignorant savages who don't understand things.

Obvioisly though, coerced child adopting isn't a good thing. But it is much down in the other PRC regions and Nepal too, I don't see why that trend wouldn't've applied to an independent Tibet.

Part of opposing imperialism is to be against it whenever it happens. If you're only against imperialism when one said does it, your not anti-imperialism, you're just anti-that other side.

[–] Tangent5280@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] MooseyMoose@lemmy.world 3 points 17 hours ago

Yeah they are an organized theocracy that regularly abused their power and children through history and exploited the peasants. It's my own personal term for them since the parallels are too hard to ignore.

[–] funkless_eck@sh.itjust.works 2 points 20 hours ago

I think they mean "is bhuddist, acts catholic"